2026-01-04 11:26:33

The market trends of BTC and ETH tell us: true breakthroughs come from breaking the limitations of thinking. From testing with a hundred thousand funds to achieving the first cycle goal, this experimental process has validated the feasibility of the strategy. Next, we will continue to track on-chain data and market rhythm, analyzing the opportunity points for the next phase. To be honest, the current choice is simple—either continue to waste time with old ideas in a bear market, or use data-driven methods to find breakthrough points. Once the market rhythm is activated, traders with strong execution ability are often able to sense the turning signals earlier.

BTC1,56%

ETH1,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotFinancialAdvice

· 01-06 09:25

Starting from 100,000 to complete the cycle goal? Is this guy really serious or just telling stories again... But data-driven approaches are definitely much better than guessing blindly.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 01-06 04:49

The success of the 100,000 verification strategy is easy to talk about but really hard to implement. I think most people are still using old routines to waste time, and only a few are truly speaking with data. On-chain data is indeed important, but the market pace has become so fast that sometimes you can't react in time. How do you manage to catch the bottom in time? Breaking mental barriers sounds easy, but in reality, most people simply can't change their trading habits. I have deep experience with this. Does strong execution ability allow you to sense signals early? I think it also requires a bit of luck; otherwise, how do you explain those who analyze well but still suffer losses? Are the cycle goals truly achieved, or do the backtest results just look good? There are too many such claims now.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLover

· 01-04 11:48

Can you verify the strategy with just 100,000? Sounds good, but the real test is still to come.

View OriginalReply0

MEVvictim

· 01-04 11:41

Is risking 100,000 just to test the waters really worth it? I just want to laugh when I see that; the real test is still ahead. --- On-chain data looks great, but it can't withstand a black swan event. It sounds smooth, but in practice, it's a different story. --- Strong execution? Easy to say. Most people are just executing the ability to chase gains and sell at a loss. --- Old ideas wear out vs. data-driven approaches. It feels like another gimmick selling a new course, but it does make sense. --- Cycle goals are achieved, and then what? Can you hold this wave, or will you get caught again? --- Once the market rhythm starts, retail investors are usually the last to know. Don't deceive yourself. --- How much has the 100,000 changed? The number that isn't spoken is the most real.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-04 11:29

A hundred thousand principal running through one cycle? Is this data-driven stuff real? Let me go check it out on the chain [dog head]

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler