Recently, I have been exploring a small position trial-and-error approach, with two targets in mind.
One is a low-market-cap obscure coin, with a market cap of only 3 million, and I believe it can achieve a 100x increase. The other is a relatively higher market-cap coin, around 40 million, with an expected growth potential of 5 to 10 times.
In terms of allocation, only 15% of the risk assets are invested in the low-market-cap coin, as high returns come with high risks. The higher market-cap coin is more stable, with a 30% allocation. With this combination, the risk-reward ratio is actually quite good, avoiding the gamble on a single asset. Small fund players can diversify like this, able to afford losses and also to win.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaser
· 01-06 19:48
3M market cap 100 times? Wake up, that's just gambler's mentality. How likely is it to actually double?
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 01-06 02:52
3m market cap 100x? Bro, are you sleepwalking?
---
Dispersed layout sounds smart, but daring to put 15% into the 3m market cap is really brave.
---
That low market cap looks like a trap no matter how I see it, but I get the feeling of stubbornness.
---
Giving 30% to 40m is a bit conservative, why not reverse the allocation?
---
It sounds like diversification, but actually you're still betting on that 3m taking off.
---
100x... How many have really come out of a bear market? Too optimistic, brother.
---
At least you know what you're betting on, which is more than most people can say.
---
Small funds should play like this; being able to lose is the only way to enjoy winning.
---
Putting 15% into the 3m market cap, that’s really bold.
---
Feels like there's just one phrase missing: "This time I bet right."
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 01-04 13:34
3M market cap wants to increase 100 times? Ha, how big must the gamble be?
15% of the position here is no joke, but diversification is indeed more rational.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapist
· 01-04 13:27
15% play with 100x leverage, this mindset is great... If I really turn things around, it'll be awesome. Even if I lose, I don't feel bad. I just like this gambler spirit haha
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodie
· 01-04 13:25
ngl this is basically like seasoning a dish - you can't just dump all your salt in one spot, gotta layer it right? the 15/30 split hits different, low mcap feels like fermenting something risky vs the 40m play is more like... established wine pairing territory. respect the risk management honestly, reminds me of proof-of-work except you're proving your portfolio doesn't suck lol
Reply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 01-04 13:22
3m's currency 100x... Your appetite is impressive, very gambling-oriented.
Recently, I have been exploring a small position trial-and-error approach, with two targets in mind.
One is a low-market-cap obscure coin, with a market cap of only 3 million, and I believe it can achieve a 100x increase. The other is a relatively higher market-cap coin, around 40 million, with an expected growth potential of 5 to 10 times.
In terms of allocation, only 15% of the risk assets are invested in the low-market-cap coin, as high returns come with high risks. The higher market-cap coin is more stable, with a 30% allocation. With this combination, the risk-reward ratio is actually quite good, avoiding the gamble on a single asset. Small fund players can diversify like this, able to afford losses and also to win.