2026-01-04 13:50:17

#数字资产动态追踪 $BTTC supply side has undergone significant changes. Over 60% of the circulating tokens have been permanently burned, meaning 58 billion tokens have disappeared from the market. Although trillions of BTTC are still actively circulating, this large-scale burn is reshaping the entire supply landscape. Inflation is being suppressed, and scarcity continues to increase — this is not just simple deflation, but a structural shift in the token economic model. If burns continue in the future and market attention rebounds, the price potential of $BTTC could be worth looking forward to. This direction has caught the attention of observers.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FarmToRiches

· 01-07 10:43

60% destroyed? That's quite aggressive. However, I've heard many destruction stories in the crypto world. The key is whether it can truly boost the market afterward.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 01-06 11:26

60% has been burned? This data is a bit outrageous; we need to verify whether it's actual destruction or just locking and hyping.

View OriginalReply0

RunWhenCut

· 01-04 14:20

60% destroyed? That number sounds impressive, but can it really support the price... still observing.

View OriginalReply0

Web3ExplorerLin

· 01-04 14:18

hypothesis: this 60% burn mechanics actually mirrors the silk road scarcity paradox—destroy enough supply, suddenly everyone's watching the same oracle network again. interestingly enough, structural tokenomics shifts like this remind me of heraclitus... everything flows, but what if we *control* the flow rate?

Reply0

governance_ghost

· 01-04 14:18

60% destroyed? That's a pretty aggressive number. It feels like it's time to buy the dip again.

View OriginalReply0

TommyTeacher

· 01-04 14:15

60% destruction sounds impressive, but I'm worried it might just be on paper and won't actually increase in value.

View OriginalReply0

BloodInStreets

· 01-04 14:04

Destroying this argument sounds pretty shaky—losing 580 billion makes it scarce? To me, it still looks like a game of a bunch of zeros.