2026-01-04 15:22:11

Let's share the recent trading progress. The total holdings have increased from 566u to 1015u. This recent operation changed my previous approach, and I started experimenting with a multi-coin deployment strategy. I added positions in ZRX and AVNT, while placing orders near the current price to wait for entry points in SQD and Aergo. Each position is only 100u.

Why did I change from the previous single-coin approach of 400u? The main reason is to reduce the risk of liquidation. The current plan is to keep each coin within 400u, combined with 2-3 phased add-ons, which allows for more flexible responses to market fluctuations.

An interesting detail — currently, the holdings look like floating losses, but I chose coins with negative fee structures. When accounting for time costs and holding periods, it’s actually profitable. That’s why I’m not in a rush to cut losses.

Now I’m debating the next step for profit realization. Should I follow a phased take-profit approach for safety, or wait until the profits reach a target and then switch to a new batch of coins? Both strategies have their pros and cons, and I’m still trying to find the right balance.

ZRX3,48%

AVNT1,55%

SQD4,21%

AERGO0,06%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ParallelChainMaxi

· 01-06 00:55

This guy has really figured it out. Moving from single coins to diversification is indeed more stable. 566 to 1015, doubling feels great, but the real essence is in the details of negative fees. Should you take profit or switch coins to enter the market? I think you need to see how long this wave can last. Gradual profit-taking for insurance is safe, but missing the next explosion point will make you regret it. My suggestion is to leave half of the profit to roll into new coins, and the rest to safely earn interest. This approach is much more reliable than blindly investing in a single coin before, with maximum risk control.

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 01-05 14:59

That move of negative fees is brilliant; playing like this is truly comfortable.

View OriginalReply0

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 01-04 22:47

This multi-currency diversification approach is indeed solid, but your negative fee arbitrage idea is a bit aggressive.

View OriginalReply0

StillBuyingTheDip

· 01-04 15:47

Hey, this wave of operations really shows clear thinking. Retail investors tend to go all-in on one coin and end up getting eaten up. I've also been pondering the negative fee arbitrage trick, but it seems to require a tight grip on the cycle. The question of whether to take profits in batches or go all-in on new coins... actually depends on your risk preference. For safety, I would still prefer to do it in batches. This wave from 566 to 1015 has a significant increase. Just don't end up back at the starting point again.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisery

· 01-04 15:46

Bro, this move is pretty interesting. I understand the shift from single-asset to multi-asset trading—it's basically just being cautious. While experiencing unrealized losses, you're still holding steady. Betting that negative fees can be turned around? I need to think about that logic more. Whether to take profits in batches or to switch currencies directly—there's no standard answer to this. It depends on how long your mindset can hold up.

View OriginalReply0

MentalWealthHarvester

· 01-04 15:40

Are unrealized losses actually profits? Okay, I need to learn this way of thinking. This trick of negative fees is indeed clever, but just make sure you don't end up self-hypnotized in the end. Partial take-profit or all-in on new coins, honestly, both can explode.

View OriginalReply0

APY追逐者

· 01-04 15:31

Bro, this diversification strategy is really smart. It's definitely much more stable than going all-in on a single coin before. I need to remember this trick of using negative fee currencies. Just looking at unrealized losses can easily make you itchy to cut losses. But honestly, taking profits in batches is still safer. Switching to new coins for entry sounds exciting, but the risks come along with it.

View OriginalReply0

StrawberryIce

· 01-04 15:29

The feeling of turning unrealized losses into unrealized gains, this fee strategy is truly unbeatable.

View OriginalReply0