2026-01-04 15:30:12

#数字资产动态追踪【Anu】Breaking the Conventional On-Chain Token Experiment

This project launched on December 23, 2025, and the gameplay is indeed a bit different. No referral system, no staking threshold, no withdrawal waiting — just pure wallet + code + trading.

Key data overview: total issuance of 200,913 tokens, buy/sell slippage set at 1.5%, the liquidity pool automatically destroys 2.4% daily and burns 5%.

In terms of mechanism design, there are two main points: first, buy and sell are completely free, allowing instant swaps within your wallet; second, holding more than 21 tokens grants participation in perpetual dividends. It sounds somewhat like a direct link between holding amount and收益.

From a technical perspective, the contract claims to be 100% open source, with permissions fully relinquished, LP black hole locked, theoretically eliminating agency risk, no private placements, no pre-mining. Fully automated on-chain execution, trading fees flow into the liquidity pool, the more frequent the trades, the thicker the pool becomes.

The project team states: no centralized operation, no invitation-only bonuses, everyone can participate in the ecosystem through trading. Buyers push prices up, sellers contribute liquidity, and holders profit through dividends. Theoretically, this avoids the risks associated with traditional market structures.

Such native on-chain projects are increasingly common, and innovations in tokenomics are continuously evolving. It’s worth watching whether the high-yield dividend promises and automatic burning mechanisms can sustain long-term popularity.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BottomMisser

· 01-05 20:07

Another claim of "100% open source" and "zero risk"... Just hearing these words makes me start sweating haha The destruction mechanism sounds good, but I'm worried there might be some tricks when it comes to actual operation 21 tokens threshold dividend? That's an interesting number design, I need to think it over

View OriginalReply0

FantasyGuardian

· 01-05 17:11

Pure on-chain automation sounds very sexy, but it still feels like the old tricks with a new coat of paint.

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 01-05 02:10

It's already 2025, and you're still doing automatic burning? Sounds good, but the pool evaporates 2.4% daily with a 5% burn rate. Who doesn't know how long it can really last?

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTrendSister

· 01-04 15:57

It's the same claim of "100% decentralization, no private placement, no pre-mining"... I've heard it too many times. The key is whether anyone can truly live off the dividends.

View OriginalReply0

tokenomics_truther

· 01-04 15:55

Is avoiding risk in theory? Haha, here we go again, always saying the same thing --- 21 tokens threshold dividend... sounds like you still need to hold positions to enjoy the benefits, nothing has changed in essence --- No private placement, no pre-mining, I've heard this countless times. The key still depends on whether trading volume can support the bottom pool --- The burning mechanism design is indeed interesting, just worried that trading volume drops and it all cools off --- Open-source contracts + relinquishing permissions, at least more sincere than those exit scam projects... but being cautious is still wise --- Wait, only 1.5% slippage for buy and sell? Is the opponent trying to make a small profit on high volume or do they have other motives? --- Dividends start from 21 tokens, so the probability of retail investors being diluted is still quite high --- Automatic destruction of 2.4%, burning 5%... the numbers look really good, but execution is another story --- No invitation system sounds good, but what will this model rely on long-term to attract new users? --- This breaking of conventions is real, but the words "in theory" always make me a bit uneasy

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 01-04 15:54

It's another story of "100% open source, permission relinquishment," which is getting a bit tiresome to hear haha. Permanent dividends sound great, but how long can they last?

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-04 15:51

Can you get dividends with just 21 tokens? Sounds like a little sweetener before cutting the leeks. --- Again, 100% open-source rights waived. I've heard this line too many times. Haha. --- Burning 2.4% of the pool daily plus 5%? Is this creating a sense of scarcity or hiding liquidity issues? --- No recommendation system is even more terrifying. It means relying on trading popularity to support the market, which is a big trap. --- Permanent dividends sound great, but who guarantees the pool can sustain it? The logical loopholes are so obvious. --- Claiming to break conventions, but in reality, it's just a Ponzi scheme with a new disguise on the blockchain. --- The freedom of instant exchange is indeed novel, but all trading fees flow into the pool. Isn't that essentially a trading tax? --- The total supply number 200913, why is it so specific? That's a bit strange. --- The theory is perfect, but in practice, it's a disaster. I bet 5 bucks this project won't last 3 months of hype. --- Dividends for holders sound wonderful, but the key is who is continuously buying in to maintain the pool. That's the core logic.

View OriginalReply0

screenshot_gains

· 01-04 15:44

It sounds like the old trick of "theoretically perfect, practically skeletal" again—dividends starting from 21 coins? The threshold is low, but this number is also carefully set; the real intention isn't just about the dividends. No centralization, no permissioning... Hmm, this phrase is getting tired now. The pooling burn mechanism is reliable, but I'm just worried that if trading volume cools down, everything's over.

View OriginalReply0

MetaDreamer

· 01-04 15:41

Wait, 21 tokens to start earning dividends? That threshold sounds very reasonable, but how many can actually reach 21? --- It's the "100% relinquish permissions" excuse again. Heard at least ten projects say the same thing last year... --- Burning 2.4% plus 5% of the pool daily. This speed won't last long unless trading volume keeps surging. --- Pure on-chain automatic execution sounds great, but the real test is whether trading counterparts are present. --- No referral system is actually refreshing; finally seeing a design that isn't a fission scheme. --- The dividend holding system, frankly, still requires someone to keep buying in for it to turn. --- Is the relinquishing of open-source permissions true? Has the contract been audited? This wasn't mentioned. --- Feels like a rebranded automatic burn scheme; the core logic still depends on the people behind it. --- The 21-token threshold is set with some thought—neither too high nor too low. Could it be just to filter out "true fans"? --- The automatic destruction mechanism can easily fall into a dead cycle in the long run. What to do when the pool gets thinner and thinner?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-ac175abd