2026-01-05 18:32:39

Leading exchanges are paving the way toward a self-custody future. By integrating CEX trading depth with non-custodial wallet capabilities, users can enjoy a seamless trading experience and early access to projects across more than 130 chains, while maintaining full control of their private keys. This model breaks the traditional binary opposition between centralized trading and self-custody — you can enjoy institutional-level liquidity and execution efficiency without compromising asset security. This marks the evolution of exchanges from mere trading platforms into key hubs of Web3 infrastructure, allowing users to find a new balance between convenience and autonomy.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MeltdownSurvivalist

· 01-08 17:07

It sounds like the story of "having your cake and eating it too," but can you really trust them with your private keys?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-06 01:53

Sounds good, but can it really be trusted? Or is it just another wave of marketing hype?

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 01-05 18:56

This is what I want to see. The exchange finally woke up, combining CEX liquidity with self-custody. Awesome. --- Finally, no need to choose between security and convenience. This move is truly excellent. --- Over 130 chains? That's pretty impressive, but having the private key in hand definitely feels more secure. --- Breaking down binary opposition sounds nice, but it all depends on whether trading depth can truly keep up. --- The key is not to lag in execution efficiency; otherwise, this balance point is just on paper. --- Early project exposure opportunities? Honestly, it still comes down to having good judgment. No matter how good the technology is, you need to know how to choose. --- Web3 infrastructure hub... sounds good, but we still need to observe whether these exchanges are reliable or not. --- Self-custody is a good thing, but users still need to securely store their private keys. It’s another challenge.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroJunkie

· 01-05 18:56

Sounds like this is another marketing tactic from the exchange—self-custody + CEX deep liquidity? Nice words, but in reality, they probably just want to install trackers in your wallet.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainArchaeologist

· 01-05 18:47

Honestly, this is the way exchanges should go. Managing keys yourself is so爽啊 --- It's the same spiel again... Do we still need custodians at critical moments? --- 130 chains? Seems a bit exaggerated, how many are actually usable? --- Finally someone is doing this, how long have we been waiting? --- Can liquidity depth really rival centralized platforms? That's the key --- I just want to know when it can operate stably, not another semi-finished product --- Controlling private keys is true, but what about gas fees? Are the costs high? --- Sounds good, but what if the exchange suddenly goes bankrupt... We still have to manage ourselves --- Can this really be popularized among retail investors? Feels more like a game for insiders --- Yes, security has improved, but is the user experience really up to par

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-05 18:43

Basically, it's about wanting to have the best of both worlds—CEX liquidity plus the security of self-custody. Sounds great, but can you really trust it?

View OriginalReply0

ConfusedWhale

· 01-05 18:38

I've heard this routine many times, but actually implementing it is another matter.

View OriginalReply0