From the trading data, price increases have driven up the turnover rate, but trading volume has remained basically flat. This indicates that the rise in turnover rate mainly results from internal liquidity restructuring within exchanges. Who is changing hands? The data shows it's still short-term traders causing the churn, while the early investors remain quite stable.
On the chip side, the health is still very good. Originally, it was expected to consolidate around $87,000 for a while, but unexpectedly, changes in the international situation (U.S. actions against Venezuela) directly ignited risk assets, leading to a surge. The current question is whether this rally can be sustained.
Event-driven and liquidity-driven movements are two different things. Market rallies driven by events tend to be more prone to reversals, while those driven by genuine liquidity are more solid. If this wave is mainly stimulated by events rather than real liquidity entering the market, there's a fairly high chance of a pullback later. Let's keep observing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MissedAirdropAgain
· 01-06 09:06
Short-term players are messing around, while veteran players are sitting steadily at the fishing platform. I've seen this trick too many times.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 01-06 02:56
Short-term traders are messing around all day, but us seasoned veterans are still holding steady... Why is the 87,000 level so easily broken through by events?
View OriginalReply0
GovernancePretender
· 01-06 02:49
Short-term clients are frantically flipping, while the veterans remain as steady as a rock. The gap...
Event-driven rebounds are the least reliable; they will inevitably pull back. Don't too early celebrate.
What’s the point of healthy chips? Just waiting for big players to cash out.
Real liquidity hasn't come in, so this rally won't last long.
Always relying on event-driven moves is exhausting. We still need institutions to actually put real money into the market.
View OriginalReply0
CoconutWaterBoy
· 01-06 02:47
What are short-term traders messing around with? Should veteran players focus on making money or just making money?
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 01-06 02:44
The short-term traders are messing around over there, while our veteran stays calmly at the fishing platform... How long this wave of events can sustain the push is really hard to say.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42
· 01-06 02:42
Short-term traders mess around for half a day, but it's still the old retail investors taking the hits. This routine is getting old.
Event-driven markets, after the rebound, you need to run; don't try to catch the bottom.
The 87,000 wave indeed didn't hold, did liquidity enter the market? I can't see it.
Old players sitting tight doesn't mean safety, it just means losing slowly when you lose.
Are the chips healthy? Let's wait for a pullback; right now, it's too dependent on events.
After the Venezuela incident passes, how much of that increase will remain?
Basically, it's short-term speculation. Don't get pushed up too high.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_again
· 01-06 02:34
Short-term traders are messing around, seasoned players are calmly sitting on the fishing platform. I know this routine too well.
Event-driven moves are easily reversed; it might get ugly later.
The 87,000 level can't hold, a correction is definitely coming.
Just waiting for liquidity to truly enter the market; right now, it's just a false fire.
What does healthy chips mean? Once the event passes, everything collapses.
Short-term traders can really cause trouble, but the veterans just smile and stay silent.
This rebound feels a bit fake; we're watching and waiting.
Event stimulation ≠ real gains; the subsequent decline is also genuine.
No trading volume movement indicates a false rally.
Early players are bottom-fishing, and we're still catching the bag.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 01-06 02:29
Trading volume hasn't kept up, which is awkward. The event is full of tension, but there's no real money follow-up... Risk factors are at their maximum.
From the trading data, price increases have driven up the turnover rate, but trading volume has remained basically flat. This indicates that the rise in turnover rate mainly results from internal liquidity restructuring within exchanges. Who is changing hands? The data shows it's still short-term traders causing the churn, while the early investors remain quite stable.
On the chip side, the health is still very good. Originally, it was expected to consolidate around $87,000 for a while, but unexpectedly, changes in the international situation (U.S. actions against Venezuela) directly ignited risk assets, leading to a surge. The current question is whether this rally can be sustained.
Event-driven and liquidity-driven movements are two different things. Market rallies driven by events tend to be more prone to reversals, while those driven by genuine liquidity are more solid. If this wave is mainly stimulated by events rather than real liquidity entering the market, there's a fairly high chance of a pullback later. Let's keep observing.