2026-01-06 02:31:12

#2026年比特币行情展望 $BTC , $ETH , $XRP

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis recently spoke out on social media, pointing out a very practical issue: the government is executing orders to include confiscated Bitcoin into the national strategic reserve, but then they are liquidating these assets, which doesn't quite add up.

What is going on here? She responded to the Department of Justice's handling of Bitcoin paid by the Samourai developer. Lummis's view is very straightforward—looking globally, other countries are actively deploying Bitcoin assets, and it’s unwise for the U.S. to continue consuming such strategic assets. The implication is that instead of selling them off, it’s better to hold onto them as national reserve assets.

This reflects a deep consideration of Bitcoin's role in the national financial strategy. From a certain perspective, how to treat existing Bitcoin assets indeed affects market expectations and policy directions in the coming years.

BTC-0,04%

ETH0,56%

XRP-0,38%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SigmaValidator

· 01-08 22:05

Haha, the US is still selling coins, while others have already started accumulating. Truly outrageous. --- Lummis is right, that logic just doesn't hold up. --- Holding Bitcoin as reserves—sounds like the US has finally figured it out? --- The whole world is bottom-fishing and accumulating coins, but the US is still clearing out. The gap... --- The Department of Justice is really adding to the market's frustration. Can't they understand strategic reserves? --- Instead of obsessing over policies, focus on the 2026 market trend—that's the real key. --- Lummis's words are hinting that US policy is about to shift. --- If it's a national reserve asset, will the price stabilize? --- Don't just listen to senators blowing hot air; you also need to see how the Department of Justice actually operates. --- This logic is so chaotic it's funny. How can the US government say one thing and do another?

View OriginalReply0

FlyingLeek

· 01-07 07:09

The US operation is really brilliant—accumulating Bitcoin with the left hand and selling it off with the right. Isn't this just fighting with itself? --- Lummis is right, the whole world is stockpiling, and we're over here causing trouble. --- Isn't holding onto it more satisfying? Why cut into it? I just don't understand these people's thought process. --- The national reserve issue should have been on the agenda long ago. It's really... --- Wait, isn't this a disguised good thing? If policies shift towards stockpiling coins, --- It's hilarious—banning and accumulating at the same time. The US government's "mutual combat" is top-notch. --- Basically, it's still a battle of interests. Some departments just want to make quick money by shirking responsibility. --- If Bitcoin could truly serve as a strategic reserve, it would have skyrocketed. We'll see how they proceed next.

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 01-06 14:21

That's right, the US side is quick to slap their own face—accumulating coins while also selling them off. Who understands this move? Holding tight is the key, just look at how other countries are doing it. Left hand policy, right hand clearing out—aren't they just fighting themselves? This wave of BTC is about to take off; it all depends on when the US policies will finally become clear. They're still wasting reserve assets now; they'll regret it later.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-06 03:01

The US government is collecting coins with one hand and selling with the other. This move is truly baffling... According to data, the global sovereign fund allocation to BTC has reached 3.2%, yet the US is doing the opposite. A risk warning: policy swings themselves are the greatest source of uncertainty.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMom

· 01-06 03:00

The US is really a case of one hand doing one thing and the other hand doing another. Lummis is not wrong at all. Everyone is accumulating, and we're still selling. Are we really that brainless? Holding onto BTC is the way to go. Policies might change again at any time. National reserves sound good in theory, but the key is actual implementation. Talking is useless. Wait, can we reach 200,000 by 2026? That way I can close my position. I have high hopes for Sister Lummis. Finally, someone is speaking human language. Asset liquidation? That's a joke. Are we selling while the world is bottoming out? This government doesn't understand blockchain. No wonder we keep losing out. Hold tight and do nothing. Wait for the right moment.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBro

· 01-06 02:59

The US government's move is really incredible. They say to hoard coins on one hand, but then turn around and sell them. They're fighting themselves.

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Whisperer

· 01-06 02:56

The United States is really doing a face-off, and sooner or later they'll regret it --- Lummis's statement this time is spot on; selling Bitcoin is like cutting your own flesh --- The problem is that many people in the US government probably don't understand what strategic reserves are --- The whole world is stockpiling, but the US is selling off, which is indeed a brilliant logic --- Holding onto this phrase is well said; the logic of strategic reserves should have been applied long ago --- The Department of Justice probably treats BTC as trash, a textbook case --- When looking back in 2026, they'll definitely regret the decision to sell these coins

View OriginalReply0

MEVEye

· 01-06 02:51

The US is really doing a slow motion with both hands; while others are accumulating coins, you're still selling off. I just can't understand this move.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 01-06 02:50

yo Lummis actually cracking the code here... us govt literally doing the opposite of every other sovereign player rn, it's giving institutional cope energy. like why are we bleeding strategic assets when el salvador and co are stacking? makes zero sense from a game theory perspective ngl

Reply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-06 02:42

Typical left-hand asset registration, right-hand asset liquidation... Re-entrancy attacks in logic, the same code would be scrutinized during audits. If it weren't for Lummis speaking out, this vulnerability could have remained hidden.

View OriginalReply0