2026-01-06 03:28:46

Recently, there has been a major development in the financial world—American banks are instructing wealth advisors to allocate up to 4% of their clients' portfolios to Bitcoin. This is not just a rumor; it marks the first time traditional financial institutions have incorporated digital assets into a standardized asset allocation framework.

A financial giant managing $1.7 trillion in assets making this decision is highly significant. In the past, the cryptocurrency market was mainly driven by retail enthusiasm, but now it is entering a new phase of long-term institutional investment. Major asset management firms like Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, and Fidelity are also following suit, incorporating 1%-5% crypto allocations into their wealth management plans.

Funds are continuously flowing into the market through compliant channels like Bitcoin spot ETFs, indicating a structural shift. Interestingly, institutional investors are now focusing beyond short-term price fluctuations—they are examining how stablecoins could impact the trillion-dollar payments market and how AI and the crypto economy might merge, reflecting deeper changes.

When this scene unfolds, it naturally prompts reflection—whether the door opened by the traditional financial system for cryptocurrencies signals the start of a new upward cycle or a sign of the market's overall maturation. Different people may have different opinions.

BTC1,63%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasBandit

· 01-08 18:05

Wait, does Bank of America really dare to allocate 4%? Traditional finance is truly panicking now. Institutional entry is different; they are directly including BTC in their standard portfolios. Our retail investors' years of perseverance have not been in vain. Now we just wait for the wealthy to follow suit with their allocations. With such a large amount of capital, the next wave of the market might be taking off. Once traditional finance opens this door, there's no turning back. BTC will eventually enter the mainstream. Funds flowing through compliant channels are of genuinely better quality—much more reliable than retail investors bottom-fishing. But here's the question: do institutions really only look at fundamentals? Or do they also consider the mood of the big players? 1.7 trillion can be crushed with a single move of the finger; we need to be cautious.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 01-08 10:45

Institutional entry is essentially a redistribution of access control — they set it at 4%, but fundamentally it's about risk isolation. It looks compliant, but in reality, it's like adding an access modifier to the contract, limiting what can be done.

View OriginalReply0

RektButAlive

· 01-06 03:58

With big institutions doing this, retail investors' chips really become more valuable... Those who got in early, just watch now.

View OriginalReply0

ApeDegen

· 01-06 03:57

Wait, does US banks really approve BTC allocation? Is this serious or what the heck is going on? Are institutions really coming in?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 01-06 03:52

Oh wow, big institutions are really starting to get serious. This time is different. Wait, just 4% position can change the narrative? Feels like the same old size... Institutional entry is a good thing, but don't celebrate too early. They play by a different set of rules. Everyone's watching Bitcoin, but in doing so, they might be missing the stablecoin trend. That's interesting.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 01-06 03:49

Ding: 4% is still too conservative; these traditional finance guys only dare to try new things. Gossip: Wait, are institutions really starting to get involved? How will retail investors play this wave? Speechless: Both ETFs and stablecoins again, the story is told so smoothly, but what about actual implementation? Resonance: Finally, someone dares to include BTC in their allocation plan—that's recognition. Teasing: 4%? I've already gone all in, haha. Questioning: Regulatory channels sound appealing, but are long-term benefits really guaranteed? Excited: BAC's move—what does this mean? You all understand, right? Calm: Don't overinterpret; institutional entry ≠ necessarily a rise in coin prices. Straightforward: It's just the prelude to big players starting to harvest; no problem. Insight: This wave is different; it has shifted from speculation to allocation, a qualitative change.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWizard

· 01-06 03:46

Haha, finally here. The actions of these big institutions really didn't disappoint me this time. Institutions have truly entered the market; the era of retail investors' frenzy is coming to an end. 4% may not sound like much, but it's a signal, brother. Wait a minute, could this be another trap set by the whales? I'm feeling a bit scared. If American banks are doing this, when will the domestic market catch up? The real highlight is in stablecoins; the payment market is a big game. Really? Morgan Stanley is involved too? Then I should increase my position. Now BTC is not just a speculative asset; it's becoming a serious asset allocation.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-06 03:38

Oh finally, big institutions are entering the market, it's a whole different level. --- 4% may not sound like much, but do you understand what it means? Once the door opens, it can't be closed. --- I just want to know how much those bloggers who tell us to hodl are currently holding, haha. --- Is the stablecoin impacting the payment market? Or should we first worry about how the central bank will react? --- Institutions are playing the long game, while retail investors are still tangled up on the daily K-line chart. Truly. --- Is this wave truly maturing, or is it another round of cutting the leeks? We'll see in the next round. --- A giant with 1.7 trillion moving can influence the entire market. This is the power of influence. --- It's tough. If I had known institutions were coming, I wouldn't have traded so frequently.

View OriginalReply0