2026-01-06 05:51:42

Interesting observation about how crypto foundations allocate resources. The Giggle initiative focuses on charitable donations while Happy-Sci channels contributions toward technology research funding. The Happy-Sci Foundation has accumulated 230k USDT in donations so far, with momentum continuing to build. These dual-track funding models show how the ecosystem is organizing capital for different social impact purposes.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ponzi_poet

· 01-09 04:18

This dual-track mode is quite interesting, but to be honest, 230k USDT is still too little for genuine research investment.

View OriginalReply0

MoonlightGamer

· 01-09 03:40

ngl happy-sci's fundraising speed this time is indeed impressive, only just starting at 230k USDT... The dual-track approach is quite a clever idea.

View OriginalReply0

BtcDailyResearcher

· 01-07 12:15

This dual-track system is interesting, but 230k is still a bit low. Can it truly promote scientific research?

View OriginalReply0

SillyWhale

· 01-07 10:49

The dual-track fund model is indeed interesting, but 230k USDT is still a bit small compared to those traditional foundations.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 01-06 06:21

230k is just the beginning. This kind of foundation model is essentially a way to indirectly harvest profits, right? How does the charity side ensure that the funds are truly used effectively?

View OriginalReply0

LongTermDreamer

· 01-06 06:21

Hi, I really like this dual-track funding model. Looking back after three years, these arrangements are just foundational ecosystem building. Although 230k doesn't seem like much, it's all about accumulation. The combination of charity and technological research—our crypto space is finally not just about speculation; it looks a bit more serious now, haha.

View OriginalReply0

ContractBugHunter

· 01-06 06:21

The dual-track system is quite interesting, but 230k still feels a bit premature.

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 01-06 06:11

The two foundation approaches are quite different—one focuses on charity, the other on R&D. 230k USDT definitely still needs more effort.

View OriginalReply0

MoonBoi42

· 01-06 06:04

ngl This dual-track system is quite interesting, but 230,000 USDT is still a drop in the bucket compared to the current ecosystem's scale... By the way, how's the progress of Giggle's charity donations?

View OriginalReply0

ExpectationFarmer

· 01-06 06:01

It sounds like happy-sci's dual-track approach is pretty good, taking care of both charity and technological research.

View OriginalReply0