The latest research report from investment banks has sent a key signal — although structural legislation for the US crypto market is expected to start in 2026, don’t expect rapid implementation. The reasons are solid: disagreements over conflict of interest clauses, anti-money laundering rules, and DeFi compliance requirements, coupled with Congress being distracted by midterm elections, mean that the final rules may be delayed until 2027, with enforcement pushed back to 2029.
This shift in the timeline is changing the flow of capital. Previously, those betting on "regulation clarifies and then takes off" are now shifting towards short-term trading strategies. This is no small matter — it’s directly altering the entire market structure.
The most affected are projects that rely on compliance narratives for support. When policy expectations are postponed, valuation support weakens. Meanwhile, large institutions, lacking long-term legal certainty, are slowing their allocation pace and preferring to deploy capital through existing compliant channels like ETFs, which are relatively less risky.
But don’t be too pessimistic. Regulatory guidance such as SEC’s innovation exemptions continues to advance, providing phased opportunities for the industry. Looking ahead, the market will show clear differentiation: leading assets will stabilize due to strong fundamentals and institutional recognition, while opportunities for small and mid-cap tokens will come more from short-term trading opportunities. For investors, the key is to see through the emotional fluctuations caused by policy uncertainties, focus on projects with real applications and cash flow potential, and remain cautious of targets that rely solely on compliance stories.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MysteryBoxAddict
· 01-08 21:33
Will it only take effect in 2029? Haha, now those projects that only tell stories are really panicking.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 01-06 08:08
Will it only take effect in 2029? Laughing out loud, it's another parliamentary drama, with regulation always in "next year."
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Rich
· 01-06 06:51
Will it only take effect in 2029? Ha, now those all-in compliance narratives are panicking.
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashier
· 01-06 06:48
Will it only take effect in 2029? Ha, it's the same old "wait and see" script. I've known for a long time that regulation is just a repetitive story.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobia
· 01-06 06:47
Are we back to this "taking effect in 2029" story again? I just want to ask, over these three years, should we go all-in or hold back?
View OriginalReply0
PumpDetector
· 01-06 06:40
lmao so 2026→2027→2029... basically we're watching regulatory theater while whales accumulate on the dip. reading between the lines here - institutions dumping compliance narratives for boring blue chips via etf is the actual signal nobody talking about
Reply0
MetaNomad
· 01-06 06:26
Effective in 2029? Ha, that means waiting another three years. The funds have already gone to play with swing trading.
The latest research report from investment banks has sent a key signal — although structural legislation for the US crypto market is expected to start in 2026, don’t expect rapid implementation. The reasons are solid: disagreements over conflict of interest clauses, anti-money laundering rules, and DeFi compliance requirements, coupled with Congress being distracted by midterm elections, mean that the final rules may be delayed until 2027, with enforcement pushed back to 2029.
This shift in the timeline is changing the flow of capital. Previously, those betting on "regulation clarifies and then takes off" are now shifting towards short-term trading strategies. This is no small matter — it’s directly altering the entire market structure.
The most affected are projects that rely on compliance narratives for support. When policy expectations are postponed, valuation support weakens. Meanwhile, large institutions, lacking long-term legal certainty, are slowing their allocation pace and preferring to deploy capital through existing compliant channels like ETFs, which are relatively less risky.
But don’t be too pessimistic. Regulatory guidance such as SEC’s innovation exemptions continues to advance, providing phased opportunities for the industry. Looking ahead, the market will show clear differentiation: leading assets will stabilize due to strong fundamentals and institutional recognition, while opportunities for small and mid-cap tokens will come more from short-term trading opportunities. For investors, the key is to see through the emotional fluctuations caused by policy uncertainties, focus on projects with real applications and cash flow potential, and remain cautious of targets that rely solely on compliance stories.