2026-01-08 09:27:49

Many AGI projects are still showing off how powerful a single feature can be. But some teams have a completely different approach—they are building a truly operational infrastructure. What's the difference? The former cares about what tricks the robot can perform, while the latter thinks about how thousands of devices can operate in sync under the same logic.

This difference in thinking is very evident. They have integrated software, scheduling, and settlement into a cohesive system, making the entire setup feel like an operating system rather than a temporary demo project. In the long run, this architectural design offers much greater potential.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

liquiditea_sipper

· 01-11 02:27

Real infrastructure is the true moat; flashy tricks are just fleeting illusions. --- I think it still has to start from the system level; otherwise, no matter how impressive the single-point features are, they are useless. --- The design approach at the operating system level is different; this is the way to go far. --- Many projects are still showing off their muscles, while some are already laying the groundwork; the scale is vastly different. --- Scheduling, settlement, and software integration—this is the difference between amateurs and professionals. --- Thousands of devices moving in unison vs. solo performances; the scale is completely different. --- In the end, can platforms and features have the same prospects? --- This wave clearly shows a generational gap in thinking; some are still in the demo stage.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-10 08:29

According to data, currently 70% of AGI projects on the market are still in the single-point optimization stage, and those truly working on infrastructure layer are indeed few and far between. This article hits the key point — connecting the software, scheduling, and settlement layers is easier said than done, but the engineering effort required to make it work... It is worth noting that this architectural thinking is exactly the same as the logic of early DeFi infrastructure development.

View OriginalReply0

SybilAttackVictim

· 01-08 09:57

This is the real deal, not just some muscle-flexing show. Only when the underlying architecture is solid can the subsequent imagination space truly open up. --- To be honest, most are still炒概念, very few truly want to build infrastructure. --- Operating system-level thinking is different; projects like these are worth paying attention to. --- The key is to be able to run, not just show off on PPT. --- Once the software scheduling and settlement are connected, the overall pattern immediately elevates, and the difficulty is another level. --- Teams working on infrastructure are really thinking long-term. --- Thousands of devices marching in unison, this concept looks much more reliable. --- Demo projects are everywhere, but genuine infrastructure is rare; isn't this a true reflection of the market?

View OriginalReply0

RugpullSurvivor

· 01-08 09:56

Really, those projects that showcase technical indicators look like they're just making PowerPoint presentations, without really thinking through how to get them running properly. Genuine work requires an overall architecture; otherwise, it's just a pile of isolated features stacked together.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHustler

· 01-08 09:52

Oh my, this is the real deal. Fancy tricks are useless no matter how elaborate. --- Software scheduling and settlement integration? This is exactly what I've been saying—infrastructure is the key. --- Thousands of devices moving in unison sounds awesome. It's much more reliable than single-point breakthroughs. --- An operating system-level architecture definitely requires a different kind of imagination. Those flashy features should really be learned. --- Finally someone said it: ecosystem vs. demo projects are simply not on the same level. --- This logic completely hit home for me. The long-term value is clearly an order of magnitude apart.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 01-08 09:49

Really, this is where the difference lies. Projects that rely solely on flashy tricks will eventually fail; infrastructure is the root. --- Damn, finally someone clarifies it. A demo and a truly usable system are fundamentally two different things. --- Operating system-level design is indeed impressive, but the problem is that teams like this are extremely rare. --- Three-layer integration sounds easy in theory, but how many can actually implement it without issues? Feels like still in the observation period. --- But I agree with your point about the architecture's potential for imagination; in the long run, it definitely has more prospects than single-point breakthroughs. --- Another article full of concepts... Can you name which project has actually achieved this? --- Wait, no, the integration of scheduling and settlement sounds complicated. Who is seriously working on this?

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 01-08 09:39

Infrastructure is the key, and projects that only showcase single features will eventually fall behind. --- Honestly, a system that can truly run is more valuable than any demo. --- Connecting distributed scheduling and settlement? This idea is way ahead of most projects. --- Got it, it's like operating system-level design versus toy-level stacking. --- I'm just curious how these teams thought of integrating all three layers; most people simply can't imagine it. --- This is what the infrastructure for AGI should look like, not just bragging about how smart their AI is every day. --- In the long run, there's definitely a lot of room for imagination, but are there any that can actually operate stably now? --- Architecture determines the ceiling; this logic is correct. --- Speaking of which, there are still quite a few projects showing off features.

View OriginalReply0