If different political leadership had remained in power, where would Bitcoin be trading today? It's a question that cuts to the heart of policy impact on crypto markets. Consider how regulatory stance, fiscal spending, and geopolitical strategies shape institutional adoption and retail sentiment. Some argue dovish monetary policies inflate asset prices across the board—Bitcoin included. Others contend that political uncertainty drives demand for decentralized assets. The counterfactual is fascinating: would we see accelerated institutional inflows? A more hostile regulatory environment? Or perhaps the trajectory remains largely unchanged, with market forces dominating political cycles? What's your take—does executive policy fundamentally alter Bitcoin's price trajectory, or are we overthinking the correlation?