Most on-chain users actually do not want to expose their activity records; they are simply making a trade-off between privacy and experience—because the most user-friendly products often prioritize ease of use. This is why privacy features continue to underperform: they always come with friction.



Imagine if Solana launches a privacy product that works exactly like Phantom, indistinguishable in every way—what would happen? Users' choices are already clear—the privacy experience will win. The key has never been about privacy itself, but whether the product is good enough.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FloorPriceWatchervip
· 20h ago
That's right, privacy is just a false need; the real need is usability.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 01-10 14:59
In plain terms, product strength overrides everything; no matter how good the privacy is, users won't buy it.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOraclevip
· 01-10 14:58
Honestly, privacy is dead in terms of interaction; no one is willing to go through trouble for privacy.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 01-10 14:35
Ultimately, it's still the UX that falls short; privacy itself isn't the problem.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGweivip
· 01-10 14:33
Basically, product strength is the key, and privacy needs to be user-friendly.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)