2026-01-10 15:31:29

Recently, many people have been discussing Miden. After a careful review, I have gained new insights.

This project is different from those that rely on hype and concepts—it's genuinely working on developing a medium- to long-term infrastructure solution. An interesting detail is that Miden's official account recently reposted industry opinions on privacy technology, which signals their emphasis on privacy.

However, there's an interesting contrast: although Miden is very active in the privacy sector, based on the publicly disclosed investor list, we haven't seen official confirmation from top-tier institutions. This information asymmetry actually prompts further thought—are they still in negotiations, or do they have other plans? The growth logic of the entire project still needs time to be validated.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

notSatoshi1971

· 7h ago

The investor list does seem a bit suspicious, either they are hiding during negotiations or they simply aren't that interested. Who knows? Miden's determination to focus on privacy is evident, but infrastructure projects are most afraid of being abandoned halfway. We'll have to wait and see how it develops. Just sharing a few privacy opinions isn't enough; real substance is needed. It's too early to make a judgment now.

View OriginalReply0

LayoffMiner

· 20h ago

The blank investor list is indeed interesting. Either the funding hasn't been finalized yet, or major institutions are waiting to see the implementation results. Anyway, it's all early days now.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerForever

· 20h ago

The silent big institutions are really interesting; projects that are genuinely doing things are actually on the fundraising list. Wait, can Miden's privacy-focused approach really be implemented, or is it just another PPT concept? Detail-oriented folks are verifying it behind the scenes; they won't say it openly.

View OriginalReply0

ContractCollector

· 01-10 16:01

Privacy infrastructure is indeed easy to hype, but Miden really seems to be working on something, not just storytelling. It's a bit strange that top institutions haven't made official announcements... Either they are still in negotiations, or the investors simply don't want to be too conspicuous? This silence is actually worth paying attention to. Regarding the investor list and the information gap, I think it's okay... Early-stage infrastructure projects are usually like this, time will tell. Wait, the forwarding of privacy technology topics... Does this mean they are planning a major move in a certain direction? The signals still don't seem clear enough. Honestly, we need to see more. I’m not sure how long Miden’s story can be told, but at least their stance looks much more professional than those reckless projects.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 01-10 15:59

actually™ the investor silence is the real tell here... tier-1 funds don't ghost infrastructure plays unless there's something fundamentally broken in the tokenomics or go-to-market strategy. have you looked at their formal verification claims? show me the proofs or it's just marketing speak tbh

Reply0

SchrödingersNode

· 01-10 15:57

Sounds pretty reliable, but the lack of endorsement from major institutions is indeed a bit suspicious. Are they holding back a big move or something... I'm curious to see how the investor list develops next. Either the funding hasn't been finalized yet, or they simply don't lack money. Wait, the privacy sector is active but lacks financing information. This combo punch is quite interesting. It still feels like a wait-and-see stage; infrastructure stuff isn't coming anytime soon.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleInTraining

· 01-10 15:53

Information asymmetry is really hitting hard. Where have all the big institutions gone? --- Miden's privacy narrative sounds good, but it's still uncertain if frontline institutions will side with it. --- The details are well laid out, but I wonder if they can sustain subsequent funding rounds. --- Infrastructure narratives are all the same, but the key still depends on actual adoption volume. --- The absence of investors is a bit strange; either they are still in talks or they just aren't interested. --- Privacy is indeed a blue ocean, but can Miden break through with this? --- Let's wait and see; it's too early to say anything now. --- The paper and project are still a long way from real-world implementation. --- With such fierce competition in the privacy track, why can Miden win? --- The lack of recognition from leading institutions itself is a signal, right?

View OriginalReply0

DataChief

· 01-10 15:51

Alright, this time I didn't see big institutions endorsing it, I always feel like something's missing --- Frequent moves in the privacy space are indeed interesting, but the investor list is really mysterious --- I support the mid-to-long-term infrastructure route, but the information asymmetry makes it a bit uncertain --- Wait, is Miden really working seriously or just packaging with the privacy concept? We need to see how they verify it later --- The lack of follow-up from big institutions makes me even more curious. Are they still raising funds or do they have other plans? --- This kind of gap is definitely worth pondering for a while. Don't jump to conclusions too early

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 01-10 15:51

the privacy pivot's interesting but ngl the investor silence is sus... usually tier-1 shops would've already flexed their bags publicly. maybe they're building something more nuanced than the usual hype cycle? hard to audit tokenomics without seeing the full cap table tho

Reply0

BlockchainTherapist

· 01-10 15:42

Yes, privacy infrastructure definitely needs someone to take it seriously, just not sure if Miden is that person. Lack of backing from major institutions is a bit suspicious; either they're still raising funds or no one really believes in them. Let's wait and see. Anyway, there are too many players in this space.

View OriginalReply0