2026-01-11 02:28:34

Data storage has always been a major challenge in the Web3 world—traditional solutions are costly, inefficient, and lack security. Now, a new approach has gained popularity: an enterprise-grade decentralized storage layer built on the Sui blockchain, using the $WAL ecosystem to solve the problem. In simple terms, it provides dApps and enterprises with a data storage solution that is both affordable and reliable.

The key is Sui's high-performance technology stack itself. With strong parallel processing capabilities and fast transaction speeds, these advantages directly translate into the usability of the storage layer. The $WAL ecosystem builds on this foundation, gradually laying the infrastructure for the next generation of the internet. From small to large, from dApps to enterprise applications, the potential of this solution is quite significant. Calling it the cornerstone of Web3 is not an exaggeration—without a reliable data layer, all other advanced applications are pointless.

SUI-2,52%

WAL-0,13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEV_Whisperer

· 01-11 09:58

Sui's performance is indeed impressive, but can the storage costs really be brought down? I'm a bit skeptical. The WAL system feels a bit overhyped; let's wait and see how it performs in practice. I agree that the data layer is important, but it's still too early. If this thing can truly solve the cost problem, then it's definitely worth paying attention to. By the way, do enterprises really use decentralized storage? I don't quite believe it.

View OriginalReply0

MindsetExpander

· 01-11 09:37

Someone finally got to the bottom of storage, it was a mess before. Sui's parallel processing is truly impressive, and the WAL combo feels promising. The data layer is crucial; everything else is just castles in the air. The logic makes sense. It feels like it's about to take off. Let's get on board and observe. If costs and security can be managed, it's definitely worth paying attention to. Compared to those vague projects, this at least solves real problems. Web3 lacks this kind of infrastructure; don't just focus on trading coins. From dApps to enterprise level, the imagination is truly full throttle. But I'm worried it might be another case of a well-received but unpopular solution. This is the kind of thing that should be studied; it's more reliable than all those flashy concepts.

View OriginalReply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 01-11 02:58

Storage layer issues have indeed been bottlenecking for a long time. The WAL approach hits the pain point, but whether it can be truly implemented depends on the ecosystem's popularity. --- Sui's parallel processing is indeed impressive, but I wonder if WAL can fully leverage this advantage. The subsequent ecosystem development is the most critical. --- Sounds very promising, but how can data security be guaranteed? Decentralized storage has heard too many stories. --- Low cost is attractive, but I'm more concerned about whether it will just become another hyped concept. --- Exactly, without a data layer, everything is pointless. That's true. It all depends on who can truly solve this problem. --- If WAL can really excel in enterprise applications, that would be amazing. dApps are easier, but gaining enterprise trust is difficult. --- Sui's high performance is indeed competitive; it's more reliable than other chains laying infrastructure. --- Another new concept and ecosystem. It depends on whether users buy in; popularity is the real indicator. --- The idea is good, but decentralized storage is a complex water to navigate, with many pitfalls. Caution is needed in following up. --- If the high storage costs are solved, the entire Web3 ecosystem will definitely breathe a sigh of relief.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaValidator

· 01-11 02:57

It's another storage track. Can Sui make it this time? It seems that $WAL still depends on market feedback. Sui's parallel processing definitely has some skills, but real implementation still has to wait. Storage layer is easier to talk about than to do; don't just discuss it on paper. Data storage is indeed a necessity; it all depends on how long $WAL can support. I'm not quite convinced; it feels like every project claims to be the cornerstone... Another one in the Sui ecosystem. Okay, let's keep an eye on it; anyway, it's not a big loss. Storage solutions are blooming everywhere. Why can $WAL stand out? Is performance really that important? I've heard this argument several times. The core question is how much can the costs actually be reduced.

View OriginalReply0

ContractHunter

· 01-11 02:55

Finally, someone is seriously addressing the persistent issue of storage. Sui's parallel processing is indeed a masterstroke. The $WAL approach is the right path; infrastructure is the key. Without a data layer, everything is just a paper tiger. This logic is sound. The Sui ecosystem is about to take off again, another wave of a golden opportunity. We really need to build from the ground up; otherwise, no matter how many applications are developed, they will be fragile. Whoever deploys first in this wave will reap the benefits. I am optimistic about the potential of $WAL. Only when costs come down can large-scale applications truly take off. It was too expensive before, which indeed discouraged adoption.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 01-11 02:47

It's another story about the storage layer, this time relying on Sui? Honestly, it’s a bit appealing to me. Sui is indeed fast, but can the storage part really compare to traditional solutions? I still want to see real data. The $WAL ecosystem infrastructure sounds good, but I’m worried it’s another case of concepts leading and data following. Will this be another hype-driven move, or is there really something there? Time will tell. Without a good storage layer, nothing can be played. That logic makes sense, but how low can the price go?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 01-11 02:40

The storage layer is indeed the bottleneck, and Sui's parallel processing really has some substance. --- If the $WAL ecosystem can truly reduce costs, it would be a game-changer. Currently, most solutions are still prohibitively expensive. --- In short, without reliable data infrastructure, even the most fancy applications are just paper tigers. --- But to be fair, can Sui run this scheme stably? It still depends on actual application data. --- The jump from dApps to enterprise level is so big; whether the transition can go smoothly remains a question. --- This idea isn't new; Filecoin and Arweave have tried similar approaches before. And the result? --- Cheap and reliable? There aren't many win-win situations in Web3, so keep a close eye on it. --- Using Sui's TPS advantage for storage is indeed a good idea, but I'm worried that the maintenance costs might also skyrocket later.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 01-11 02:33

Still talking about Sui, huh? This time, from a different perspective. --- Data storage is indeed a pain point, but can WAL handle it? --- I've heard the parallel processing approach too many times. Can it really be cheap enough for enterprises to buy in? --- Foundation, foundation, I'm already tired of hearing about it... Let's get a small application running first. --- Sui's speed is indeed impressive, but is the storage cost really that much lower than traditional solutions? --- For enterprise applications, stability is still key; speed alone isn't enough. --- It's another story about infrastructure. When will it turn into real revenue? --- Without a reliable data layer, it's definitely not feasible, but can this setup be stable?

View OriginalReply0