A16Z invests $15 million in the Babylon project, sparking much reflection within the industry. Interestingly, the current market cap of Babylon is only $55 million, which means that A16Z's funding accounts for about 30% of the project's total market value—such a ratio is indeed worth considering.



Even more noteworthy is the performance of related projects within the ecosystem. Based on Babylon's built LST application Lombard Finance, its market cap data contrasts sharply with the funding scale of the parent chain project. This phenomenon reflects a real issue: there is sometimes a significant disconnect between the investment decisions of leading VCs and the actual market performance of the projects. Traditional evaluation dimensions such as investment logic, team background, and technological prospects may not accurately predict a project's long-term value in the rapidly changing Web3 market. This also serves as a reminder for investors to maintain rational thinking about funding backgrounds and market realities.
BABY-3,22%
BARD-1,12%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ConfusedWhalevip
· 5h ago
30% share, huh? That's pretty intense. --- VC's vision isn't always accurate; Web3 is moving too fast. --- I feel like Babylon was overhyped this time; Lombard's performance is a slap in the face. --- The head investors crashing—what does that mean? --- Really? The funding scale and market feedback are completely different. --- That's why I never follow big institutions blindly; they're too unreliable. --- Market cap of 55 million compared to 15 million in funding—how much profit did VC make? --- The key is how the subsequent ecosystem projects perform to see if the investment logic is correct.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxietyvip
· 17h ago
A16Z invested 15 million, but the market cap is only 55 million. No matter who it happens to, it's embarrassing... Basically, they just made a wrong bet.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinjavip
· 17h ago
VC's vision is just so-so; a 30% funding share can still cause the project to fall into this state, which is really ironic.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbievip
· 17h ago
Haha, A16Z invested 15 million, but the market cap is only 55 million. This deal is really ruthless. With a 30% stake, it seems VC's vision in Web3 isn't as sharp as it used to be. Lombard, on the other hand, is taking off, and the contrast is quite stark.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfervip
· 17h ago
A16Z invested $15 million, but the market cap is only $55 million? That 30% share is outrageous, feels a bit like bloodshed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)