2026-01-11 20:22:45

Many people look at Walrus tokens, only seeing the infrastructure layer. In fact, there is much more to this ticket than meets the eye.

What does holding WAL mean? It means you have decision-making power. Which chain to support, which data to prioritize, how to set fees—these core decisions that keep the network running are in the hands of token holders. This is not just a simple voting mechanism, but a genuine right to participate in decentralized data governance.

As more applications rely on this network (from large transfer alerts to on-chain compliance checks), the weight of this governance power will only grow. Staking, running nodes, participating in delegation—these may seem like technical actions, but fundamentally they contribute to the network’s security and share in the ecosystem’s growth.

So, in the end, what are you doing? Are you trading a token code, or are you co-building a data infrastructure? This choice determines how you view this ecosystem.

WAL0,53%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LostBetweenChains

· 5h ago

Oh, this is the key point. I was indeed one-sided before. People always think about getting rich overnight and never consider governance rights. Staking validator nodes, to put it simply, is about truly participating in the ecosystem, not just pure gambling. It seems I need to reevaluate this project. WAL is not just a coin; it represents the entire data network's voice. Once it’s applied, this power will indeed be valuable. To be honest, most people are just crypto traders and haven't really thought about building infrastructure together. This perspective is good; I need to think it over carefully.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeJumper

· 6h ago

Damn, this is the real governance token. --- Well said, many people are just speculating on coins and haven't really thought about what they are buying. --- Exactly, but the problem is that most people probably don't have the energy to participate in governance. --- This perspective is indeed novel, but on the other hand, won't the actual decision-making power still be monopolized by big players? --- Got it, it's not about the coin itself, but about network voting rights. --- It feels like this is the ecological mindset that walrus wants, but there are still a bunch of short-term traders in the market. --- I'm interested in staking for returns; governance rights sound sophisticated, but in practice? --- This logic is a bit like early ETH; can it truly achieve self-governance?

View OriginalReply0

DevChive

· 9h ago

It's another story about governance rights, I'm tired of hearing it haha --- Basically, it's about whether the betting ecosystem can grow significantly --- Staking nodes are definitely more attractive than just holding coins --- How much are governance rights worth now? Let's wait until the applications are fully built out --- I still prefer to make profits through arbitrage; doing all this is too complicated --- The premise of governance weight is that the ecosystem is really up and running. Right now? Hehe

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 01-11 20:52

Governance rights have indeed been underestimated, but the prerequisite is that someone actually participates.

View OriginalReply0

DustCollector

· 01-11 20:47

Bro, this is the true value of holding coins Not the kind that only looks at candlestick charts

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBlindCat

· 01-11 20:44

Governance rights have indeed been underestimated, but don't overhype them either.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-11 20:37

Another perspective of "deep thinking," but to be honest, how practical is the execution of governance rights that sound appealing?

View OriginalReply0

MagicBean

· 01-11 20:36

Wow, really? I never thought about governance rights before. Wait, how are staking rewards calculated? Are there specific data? It sounds good, but the key is whether the application is actually being used. This logic is indeed clever, but it still depends on who is truly participating in governance. The compliance check part sounds quite imaginative, but it's still in the conceptual stage. Suddenly I feel I bought in too early; I should wait until the application is up and running before jumping in. Governance rights ≠ making money, don’t be fooled, brothers. It's basically a gamble on whether the network can survive, with maximum risk.

View OriginalReply0