2026-01-11 20:33:38

Just made 1.18 in rewards exploring how Beyond Tech is reshaping Bitcoin's liquidity landscape. The project tackles a real pain point: how do you move trillions of liquidity between Bitcoin and 140+ blockchains without creating fragmentation?

Their approach is elegant. External assets flow into Bitcoin seamlessly, while BTC can move out to other chains with full security intact. Instead of fragmenting Bitcoin across sidechains, they're actually unifying Bitcoin's meta protocols and sidechain ecosystems into a coherent layer.

It's the kind of infrastructure play that doesn't grab headlines but quietly becomes essential as Bitcoin's role in cross-chain finance deepens.

BTC1,72%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerGas

· 9h ago

1.18 returns? Bro, how did you calculate that? Did you include the actual interaction costs... The on-chain fragmentation issue is indeed a dilemma in game theory equilibrium, but I haven't seen a solution that truly unifies liquidity yet. Beyond Tech's narrative sounds like a standard infrastructure story; I need on-chain evidence from the testnet snapshot to believe it. How is cross-chain security guaranteed? That's the key—don't just talk about elegance.

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 01-11 20:57

ngl this is the real infrastructure. No fancy narratives, just getting the work done.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-11 20:53

Cross-chain liquidity is indeed a pain point, and Beyond Tech's approach is quite good.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 01-11 20:49

Quite interesting, a truly fundamental infrastructure project. But with a 1.18 return... Have you considered the arbitrage opportunities after gas optimization? It feels like there might still be chances in the mempool.

View OriginalReply0