2026-01-11 21:21:59

The true value of DeFi lies in returning power to the users, and the Walrus protocol does this quite thoroughly. The core of the entire design is the WAL token, which tightly integrates staking and governance, thereby activating the community. Users who lock in WAL not only earn rewards but more importantly can directly participate in the protocol's evolution. This is completely different from traditional passive investment—shifting from passive to active engagement, and the motivation is there.

On the technical side, it's worth mentioning. Erasure coding enables distributed data storage, combined with blob storage solutions, significantly improving the efficiency and stability of large file management. This architecture provides a reliable infrastructure for DeFi applications. For example, when users participate in liquidity mining, staking WAL allows for private operations, avoiding market volatility risks, with a similar user experience.

The governance mechanism is also quite interesting. Token holders form a DAO-like structure, voting to decide upgrade directions, ensuring the protocol can continuously evolve with market demands. This model has already been implemented on some leading exchanges, with good liquidity and significantly improved convenience.

The practical application prospects look quite promising. Enterprise users can build decentralized databases based on Walrus, which are low-cost, censorship-resistant, and have the potential to disrupt the cloud service market; individual developers deploying dApps and participating in network maintenance can also earn WAL incentives. From a network design perspective, the staking mechanism drives users to contribute storage resources, forming a self-sustaining ecological loop. This sustainable model is worth paying attention to.

WAL-0,13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SlowLearnerWang

· 14h ago

Another governance token and an ecosystem closed loop... Why do I feel like I've heard this spiel several times before? Wait, erasing code? Blob storage? How can these two things be used for private operations? That sounds a bit far-fetched.

View OriginalReply0

MrDecoder

· 15h ago

WAL's design this time really has some substance, making people less passive. After all this time, finally a project is seriously implementing decentralization. Staking mining + governance voting combo, I like this approach. But liquidity still needs to be observed further; it's a bit early to say it's sustainable. How will the cloud service be implemented? Feels like it's mostly on paper. DAO voting sounds great, but can it actually be executed properly? Is this erasure coding really reliable? Are there no risks with large files?

View OriginalReply0

TeaTimeTrader

· 15h ago

It sounds like Walrus has done a pretty good job with governance rights, shifting from passive earning to active participation, which is definitely more exciting. I'm optimistic about this staking incentive design logic, but liquidity still needs to be observed further. Erasure coding as a technical architecture looks promising, but ordinary users need to learn how to use it. The truly implementable applications are the winners; good design alone isn't enough. Whether the WAL ecosystem can sustain itself depends on community activity. Decentralized databases indeed have room for imagination, but I'm worried it might end up becoming a chicken rib in the end. Staking mechanisms to stimulate contributions? Sounds great, but could it just be another new trick for the chives? Token voting is quite interesting; compared to simple dividends, it definitely offers a greater sense of participation. The technology is solid, but the key is whether there are real application scenarios to support it. The governance model similar to DAO is now everywhere; does Walrus have anything special?

View OriginalReply0

SellLowExpert

· 15h ago

The art of cutting losses, let me be honest—WAL's approach doesn't really look like the traditional "harvesting" tactics. The staking governance logic is coherent, but the key still depends on whether the later operations can truly attract the developer ecosystem. Otherwise, having just the technical framework is pointless. I'll be waiting to be proven wrong or to be hit with a flying shoe.

View OriginalReply0

BoredApeResistance

· 15h ago

This WAL really has some substance; integrated staking governance, no longer just a simple financial game. By the way, does the erasure coding system really work? Are you not worried about data security issues? Walrus wants to revolutionize traditional cloud services, and that tone is a bit bold... Holder DAO sounds great, but in reality, will it just be big players calling the shots? The storage ecosystem is self-sustaining. If it can really run smoothly, that would be impressive, but it still depends on actual user data.

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 16h ago

WAL's design really resonated with me; the staking-as-governance logic is brilliant. Finally, no more passive earning. Wait, private operation to mitigate risks? I need to see how that's implemented... Decentralized databases are a promising direction, but with the competitive cloud service market, can it truly make an impact? DAO governance sounds appealing, but will the voting participation rate be as low as other projects, turning into a mere formality? I'm a bit tempted, but it depends on whether the subsequent liquidity can stay stable. Wait, could this be another high-APY trap? I've learned to be smarter. The erasure coding distributed storage solution is definitely better than centralized ones; this is the kind of infrastructure it should be. Self-sustaining ecosystems? Sounds ideal, but there aren't many successful cases.

View OriginalReply0