2026-01-12 05:22:04

Honestly, in recent years, most discussions about RWA have been more about hype than substance. Many teams casually turn offline assets into tokens, shouting about a liquidity revolution, only to see it disappear quickly. Very few can truly tackle the hard issues like legal compliance, custody, and clearing all at once.

However, Dusk's approach is interesting, not because of flashy technology, but because it has prioritized compliance and privacy from the very beginning, and then used that to drive actual securities onto the blockchain. This difference in priorities may seem subtle, but it ultimately determines how far they can go.

Let's start with the most solid part. Dusk's collaboration with NPEX in the Netherlands is not just a name drop. NPEX holds EU-recognized financial licenses such as MTF, multi-category brokerage licenses, and ECSP. This means that assets going on-chain are built on a legal framework and market foundation from the start, rather than relying on the dream of "just putting it on chain equals compliance."

Data speaks volumes. DuskTrade plans to bring over €300 million worth of tokenized securities onto the chain, including equities, bonds, and fund shares of various types. This is not a small pilot; it’s a real experiment moving the capital markets for small and medium-sized enterprises onto the blockchain, with a scope that’s entirely different in scale.

On the technical side, the DuskEVM launched in mid-January allows the Ethereum ecosystem—contracts, toolchains, developer resources—to migrate at low cost. Your familiar Solidity code can run directly, with settlement on Dusk’s Layer 1. This modular design is especially friendly to institutions. The biggest headache for institutions is rewriting entire systems for new public chains; now, the cost is significantly reduced.

Finally, on privacy. Hedger’s privacy engine combines zero-knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption, enabling the system to protect transaction and position information from being publicly disclosed while generating proofs for regulators on demand. The chain is neither "completely naked" nor a "black box." Regulators can verify, and user information remains protected. Achieving this balance sounds simple in theory but is truly challenging in practice.

DUSK-3,06%

ETH3,25%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiChef

· 42m ago

Really, RWA is now just a bragging contest. I need to see how Dusk's approach develops later. Honestly, 300 million euros on the chain sounds impressive, but the key is whether the NPEX team can really get the legal issues sorted out. Hedger's privacy solution is quite interesting, but how long this balance can be maintained remains to be seen. The low migration cost of DuskEVM is pretty good, saving us from redoing everything. Prioritizing compliance is a good idea, but I'm worried it might just be a gimmick again. It looks promising, but don't be another storytelling expert—wait and see before hyping it. This time, it doesn't seem all talk, but I still need to dig into the details before taking action. If the entire logical flow works out and it can be truly implemented, that would be real skill. Regulatory review is the toughest test of real ability; don't get stuck there.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 4h ago

The true track advantage is built this way, not through fancy techniques, but by treating compliance as the first principle. 300 million euros worth of securities on the chain... This scale begins to create arbitrage opportunities, but the key question is whether those institutions will really come? DuskEVM directly runs Solidity code to reduce costs—this move is indeed powerful, saving us a lot of trouble with reengineering. The privacy layer is designed this way—allowing regulatory verification while protecting user data—honestly, this is the kind of design that can truly break through the compliance ceiling. The previous RWA projects were just a pipe dream; now, Dusk has at least changed the game rules.

View OriginalReply0

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 01-12 05:52

ngl, the 300M EUR tokenization target actually has teeth—empirically speaking, that's where real institutional adoption metrics start showing up. most RWA projects are just governance theater lmao

Reply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 01-12 05:52

Now I see that RWA finally has some reliable players, but a scale of 300 million euros really hits me.

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 01-12 05:48

Hey, wait a minute, Dusk isn't just about hype, NPEX's credentials are there for everyone to see, a scale of 300 million euros is no joke. Compliance is the top priority, I respect that attitude. Can privacy and regulation be satisfied at the same time? That's the real challenge. DuskEVM is directly compatible with Solidity, which significantly reduces institutional costs. That's interesting. Honestly, most of RWA is nonsense, but this one is a bit different. NPEX has EU certification backing it, so it's on a different level, unlike those self-promoting projects. A 300 million euro on-chain trial—if it really takes off, the potential is enormous. Zero-knowledge proofs combined with homomorphic encryption, providing both privacy and transparency for regulators—finding that balance is really difficult. Placing compliance ahead of technology actually helps get things right.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMemeDealer

· 01-12 05:47

Wow, finally seeing a RWA project that doesn't hype. Dusk's approach is indeed unique. 300 million euros on the chain is no joke; this is real implementation. Prioritizing compliance is a pretty bold move; most others do the opposite. Hedger is a bit of a game-changer, satisfying regulators while not fearing exposure, striking a good balance. DuskEVM allows institutions to avoid rewriting code, which is a small detail but very useful. But it still depends on whether big institutions will actually step in; numbers on paper are easy, real progress is the real test. The migration cost for the Ethereum ecosystem has been a long-standing problem; this time, low-cost solutions can save a lot of trouble. This seems more reliable than those who shout revolution every day; at least they've tackled the hard issues first. The license endorsement from NPEX is truly substantial, not just a story they boast about. Will this price rise with the news, or is it just another concept coin?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSweaterFan

· 01-12 05:34

Alright, finally someone is not bragging. Those previous RWA projects were really all the same, fusion launching, fundraising, and then disappearing, so annoying. This time Dusk is indeed different. I agree with the idea of prioritizing compliance. However, 300 million euros sounds quite large, but actual implementation is the key—don't let it be just a PPT coin. The DuskEVM design is indeed a bit clever, connecting to the Ethereum ecosystem to reduce migration costs. Institutions will definitely be interested in this. I need to do more research on the privacy engine; homomorphic encryption is easy to talk about but hard to implement... But being able to find a balance between regulation and privacy is truly rare. Let's wait and see the performance report of DuskTrade.

View OriginalReply0