It's pretty clear that Canton Network has managed to attract a significant wave of institutional capital that was previously sitting on the sidelines. When you've got momentum working in your favor, it tends to compound on itself pretty quickly. What makes this particularly interesting is the track record backing it up—over a decade of proven execution through its parent company Digital Asset gives real credibility to what they're building.



But here's where it gets more nuanced: there's still an ongoing conversation in the space about the tradeoffs between permissionless and permissioned blockchain architectures. Canton Network's approach represents a deliberate choice in this debate. Some argue that permissioned systems offer better institutional compliance and control, while permissionless advocates push for broader accessibility and censorship resistance. The institutional adoption we're seeing might suggest permissioned networks are winning this particular round—at least when it comes to capturing serious capital and professional participants.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockwatcher9000vip
· 2h ago
NGL, the permissioned chain won this round, but just wait and see, decentralized believers will eventually turn the tables.
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_apevip
· 01-13 03:51
NGL, digital assets have had solid backing over the past ten years, but can permissioned truly win? I'm still raising a question mark.
View OriginalReply0
ContractHuntervip
· 01-12 06:36
It seems like the permissioned chain is really about to take off, with institutional funds pouring in. --- Digital Asset has been endorsed for ten years, no wonder Canton can attract so much money... But should the permissionless side be worried? --- Wait, isn't this saying that institutions have won? What do the decentralization enthusiasts say? --- You can tell who wins based on where capital flows. The answer is very clear now. --- It feels like the hype around permissioned systems has been exaggerated... but it does seem to attract more institutions? --- With ten years of execution behind it, no wonder its momentum is so strong. --- By the way, do institutions really care so much about compliance, or do they just want control? --- The word "momentum" is used perfectly; those that rise the fastest often fall the fastest.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatientvip
· 01-12 05:53
NGL, a ten-year track record really can impress big institutions. Institutional collusion works like this—one move, and everyone follows. Permissionless is indeed very useful, but what about the true decentralized ideal? Canton's move was steady, but the problem is that ultimately power is still concentrated. Does capital flow where the win is? That logic has some issues... Diamond hands are still waiting for a permissionless comeback. Digital Asset endorsements do carry some weight, but beware of institutional market manipulation, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLadyvip
· 01-12 05:44
ngl the permissioned vs permissionless thing feels like watching two different markets operate on completely different timelines... institutional money doesn't care about your cypherpunk ideals, they just want predictable gas costs and zero drama
Reply0
ser_we_are_ngmivip
· 01-12 05:40
Well, the permissioned approach has long been the winning strategy. Institutions are just buying into this, and it's clear where the money is flowing.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHuntervip
· 01-12 05:39
Well... Digital Asset's endorsement over more than ten years is indeed not just for show, but can the permissioned path really outperform permissionless? --- Institutions are flocking in, and it looks very promising, but how long can this wave of hot money last? --- Honestly, the temptation of compliance is just too great, but what about the spirit of decentralization... Never mind, I think both are necessary. --- Does holding control so tightly with the permit approach truly align with the original intention of blockchain? --- Momentum is indeed strong, but I just want to know when the downturn will start. --- Ten years of accumulation is impressive, but if permissioned truly wins, can those small projects survive? --- This is the game of big capital; compliance is indeed very attractive... but it feels like something is missing.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 01-12 05:38
nah look, permissioned chains winning? that's exactly what happens when institutions start accumulating... paper hands don't even realize they're funding their own captivity lmaooo
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)