The Bitcoin market has just experienced a significant correction. As of January 12, 2026, BTC is trading around $92,090 with a 1.41% increase in the past 24 hours. This volatility occurs amid renewed debates about quantum risks being brought up again on media platforms and social networks.
The wave of panic rekindled
Recently, voices have emerged suggesting that quantum computers could quickly break Bitcoin’s security mechanisms, especially the early wallets of Satoshi Nakamoto. These claims have caused concern within the investor community, with some believing it could undermine confidence in this cryptocurrency.
However, most leading industry experts highly regard the dramatization of these concerns. They point out that such fears seem to fundamentally misunderstand how Bitcoin operates.
Clarifying misconceptions about Bitcoin security
To understand why these concerns appear exaggerated, it’s important to grasp the cryptographic string called get back là gì – which refers to private and public keys. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, explained this mechanism in detail:
Bitcoin does not store value behind traditional encryption layers like password-protected files. Instead, it uses digital signatures to verify ownership. Users prove they hold Bitcoin without revealing their private keys – this is the fundamental difference that significantly reduces the threat compared to what critics have imagined.
Public issue: Public keys are rarely exposed
An additional protective factor comes from how Bitcoin manages public information. Public keys are only revealed when a transaction actually occurs. Many early wallets – including those linked to Bitcoin’s founder – have never initiated any transfers.
This means attackers have no information to target, even if they possess advanced technology. Without that information, a powerful quantum system cannot carry out any attack actions.
Advanced countries adopt a more balanced perspective
While Vitalik Buterin of Ethereum has acknowledged that quantum risks are real but quantifiable, and Anatoly Yakovenko of Solana estimates that powerful computers could emerge within the next 10 years, Adam Back has a much calmer outlook.
Back believes that any real quantum threat could take two to four decades to develop, if it occurs at all. Current systems still lack the stability to cause actual damage.
Bitcoin can adapt and evolve
It’s important to note that Bitcoin is not a fixed system. Quantum-resistant cryptography already exists, and the network can upgrade and evolve before any danger becomes a real threat.
Famous Bitcoin analyst Willy Woo also shares this view. According to him, even in the worst-case scenario, the Bitcoin network will survive and be capable of recovery. Strong sell-offs will stimulate buying interest from long-term investors, leading to a prolonged correction rather than a revolution for Bitcoin.
Currently, most industry experts agree that the panic about quantum risks mainly exists in news reports, while the reality is much less dramatic.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Expert warns: The quantum threat to Bitcoin is still far beyond the horizon
The Bitcoin market has just experienced a significant correction. As of January 12, 2026, BTC is trading around $92,090 with a 1.41% increase in the past 24 hours. This volatility occurs amid renewed debates about quantum risks being brought up again on media platforms and social networks.
The wave of panic rekindled
Recently, voices have emerged suggesting that quantum computers could quickly break Bitcoin’s security mechanisms, especially the early wallets of Satoshi Nakamoto. These claims have caused concern within the investor community, with some believing it could undermine confidence in this cryptocurrency.
However, most leading industry experts highly regard the dramatization of these concerns. They point out that such fears seem to fundamentally misunderstand how Bitcoin operates.
Clarifying misconceptions about Bitcoin security
To understand why these concerns appear exaggerated, it’s important to grasp the cryptographic string called get back là gì – which refers to private and public keys. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, explained this mechanism in detail:
Bitcoin does not store value behind traditional encryption layers like password-protected files. Instead, it uses digital signatures to verify ownership. Users prove they hold Bitcoin without revealing their private keys – this is the fundamental difference that significantly reduces the threat compared to what critics have imagined.
Public issue: Public keys are rarely exposed
An additional protective factor comes from how Bitcoin manages public information. Public keys are only revealed when a transaction actually occurs. Many early wallets – including those linked to Bitcoin’s founder – have never initiated any transfers.
This means attackers have no information to target, even if they possess advanced technology. Without that information, a powerful quantum system cannot carry out any attack actions.
Advanced countries adopt a more balanced perspective
While Vitalik Buterin of Ethereum has acknowledged that quantum risks are real but quantifiable, and Anatoly Yakovenko of Solana estimates that powerful computers could emerge within the next 10 years, Adam Back has a much calmer outlook.
Back believes that any real quantum threat could take two to four decades to develop, if it occurs at all. Current systems still lack the stability to cause actual damage.
Bitcoin can adapt and evolve
It’s important to note that Bitcoin is not a fixed system. Quantum-resistant cryptography already exists, and the network can upgrade and evolve before any danger becomes a real threat.
Famous Bitcoin analyst Willy Woo also shares this view. According to him, even in the worst-case scenario, the Bitcoin network will survive and be capable of recovery. Strong sell-offs will stimulate buying interest from long-term investors, leading to a prolonged correction rather than a revolution for Bitcoin.
Currently, most industry experts agree that the panic about quantum risks mainly exists in news reports, while the reality is much less dramatic.