There is a harsh reality in product implementation: whether you can go online is often not determined by how advanced the underlying technology is, but by two very practical issues—one is whether you can handle the most common and tedious requirements; the other is whether compliance and privacy can truly be integrated into system design instead of relying on external patches.



In the past two years, a storage protocol emphasizing "programmable storage" and "verifiable data" has indeed been distinctive. But what truly transforms it from a "technical option" into a "practical application platform" are two recent combined strategies: one focuses on reducing the cost and complexity of handling massive small files, and the other aims to unify the transparency of public chains and access control for business needs into a single trusted system.

Why are small files a "hell" in decentralized storage? Think about these scenarios: NFT images and metadata, UI component assets, chat attachments and thumbnails, AI agent communication logs, sensor data and log snippets, enterprise audit records and operation trails—all are fragments of KBs or tens of KBs.

In the Web2 world, using object storage doesn’t feel pressured because mature batch processing and indexing systems are provided. But in decentralized storage, the problem with small files is that "each file is a complete process." Encoding overhead, transaction costs, metadata management, retrieval paths—these expenses must be paid for each file. This causes storage costs and engineering complexity to be invisibly magnified several times.

Recently, the Quilt project launched by the Walrus ecosystem is a direct response to this issue. By optimizing the aggregation and processing mechanisms for small files, it reduces the repetitive costs at the individual file level. Coupled with the access control layer provided by Seal, it preserves the verifiable features on-chain while giving business logic real control over permissions. Only this kind of combination can truly enable decentralized storage to move from the infrastructure stage into a usable application platform.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FallingLeafvip
· 14h ago
Small files are indeed a pain point, and I have been troubled by this before. The combination of Quilt+Seal is a good idea, and finally someone is addressing this issue.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQvip
· 01-12 06:45
tbh the small file problem is such a brutal bottleneck that nobody talks about... like yeah we can wax poetic about decentralized provenance but if every kb costs you a transaction fee the whole aesthetic collapses lmao
Reply0
PanicSellervip
· 01-12 06:40
Small file costs do have quite a few pain points, but the question is whether Quilt can really handle this many KB-sized fragments... it depends on the actual TPS and gas consumption.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaservip
· 01-12 06:40
Small files are indeed the Achilles' heel of decentralized storage; it really needs to be properly addressed. --- To be honest, it still has to start from practical engineering; otherwise, no matter how impressive the architecture is, it’s all in vain. --- I've looked at the Walrus combo, and the ideas behind Quilt+Seal are quite clear. However, whether it can truly be implemented depends on whether the ecosystem keeps up. --- Compliance is the real hidden danger; once the technical issues are solved, there are still many pitfalls on the business side. --- Web2 has long internalized the issue of small file costs. Catching up in decentralized storage is indeed not easy. --- The key is to actually use this set of tools; otherwise, even the best design is just on paper. --- How to balance access control and on-chain transparency—that's the real test for product managers. --- I agree with this analysis, brother. Advanced technology ≠ usability; they are two different things.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokensvip
· 01-12 06:31
The explosion in small file costs is indeed the Achilles' heel of decentralized storage. Web2 has long understood that batch processing must be redesigned from the ground up to work on-chain. Quilt's aggregation logic is interesting, but it still depends on whether the actual TPS can handle it to be meaningful.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007vip
· 01-12 06:28
That's right, all this talk about advanced technology is nonsense; in the end, it still comes down to making money in practice. The cost of small files is indeed a pain point, and the Quilt+Seal combination has some potential. However, whether the Walrus ecosystem can really take off depends on whether application developers are willing to adopt it. The biggest fear is having a good technology that no one wants. On compliance, don't be too optimistic; privacy protection in encrypted storage often involves compromises. Wait, can access control truly be both transparent and trustworthy? It seems a bit contradictory. Anyway, it's just another方案 waiting for validation; whether the user experience is good or not remains to be seen.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)