2026-01-12 06:23:42

During my time working with RWA, I’ve encountered many pitfalls—many projects on the market simply slap a blockchain label on offline assets, and hardly anyone takes compliance, custody, and auditing seriously. After six months of repeatedly studying the technical framework and implementation process of a leading RWA project, my ideas have become clearer: these projects are not just marketing gimmicks, but treat compliance and privacy as real engineering problems.

The core difficulty is actually quite straightforward. Institutions want to put assets on-chain, but are stuck in two areas: one is that business secrets and trading strategies cannot be exposed on public blockchains for everyone to see; the other is that they must provide regulators and auditors with a "traceable window." Current privacy chain solutions tend to go to extremes—either privacy is so tight that regulators cannot access it at all, or compliance is written as empty words with no real constraints.

A different approach is to use cryptography and process control to make "confidentiality" and "auditability" capabilities at the protocol layer—these are not opposing but complementary.

From an architecture perspective, this solution separates modules: the lower layer handles data availability and transaction speed, while the upper layer manages contract execution and privacy processing. The lower layer adopts a committee-based consensus (similar to a variant of Succinct Attestation), aiming for second-level finality and low overhead; the upper layer is compatible with the EVM ecosystem, allowing Solidity developers to work without a learning curve, and it also includes built-in privacy primitives. The advantage of this division of labor is obvious—it allows independent optimization of throughput or privacy strength without mutual interference.

The privacy layer uses a combination of homomorphic encryption and zero-knowledge proofs. The core logic is to enable verification and settlement of data while encrypted, so plaintext is never exposed. This is not a new technology, but weaving them into a deployable engineering system is something not all projects can achieve.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVEye

· 1h ago

Half-year pitfall summary, is that all? Should have researched like this before investing... But honestly, most RWA projects are really just copycats, and compliance is basically just a decoration. To put it simply, if the contradiction between privacy and traceability could really be solved at the protocol layer, then this track would indeed have potential... We need to see if it can actually be implemented. The combination of homomorphic encryption with ZK technology isn't particularly new, but the key issue is the huge gap in engineering implementation, and most teams simply can't handle it.

View OriginalReply0

ResearchChadButBroke

· 01-12 13:01

Is this all you came up with after half a year of research? To put it simply, it's just homomorphic encryption + zero-knowledge proof wrapped together. Similar ideas have been outdated in the market for a long time.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSurfer

· 01-12 06:53

Only six months to figure it out? I'll say it in one sentence: most RWA are just Photoshop jobs, and truly engineering-focused projects are few and far between. --- Cryptography + process control sounds great, but what about when it’s actually deployed? Will regulators really buy into it? --- It sounds good, but in the end, it still depends on policy trends to determine success or failure. No matter how perfect the technical solution is, it’s useless. --- Homomorphic encryption combined with zero-knowledge proofs—this approach is truly different. Just don’t know how the gas fees will blow up haha. --- Lottery consensus + EVM compatibility, I respect this division of labor. At least someone isn’t blindly stacking privacy. --- After all this talk, it’s the same old problem—who will truly audit these so-called "traceable windows"? --- Six months of blood, sweat, and tears. For me, this half-year has been a complete loss, and it’s really bothering me. --- Are compliance and privacy complementary rather than opposed? Then why do products on the market still have to choose one or the other?

View OriginalReply0

Deconstructionist

· 01-12 06:53

Really, after half a year of research, this is the extent of the gain? The compliance window sounds good in theory, but in practice, it's just various compromises... Let's see whose committee drawing can truly resist censorship pressure, rather than ending up as just another centralized endorsement. The cryptographic combination sounds powerful, but what about gas fees? Homomorphic encryption + zk proof computational overhead—can users afford to bear it? Honestly, most RWA projects are still in the "proof of concept" stage, pretending they're already ready. This project at least dares to face the tension between privacy and compliance, so it's not bad. But the real test is whether institutions will actually use it after launch, or if they'll continue to prefer a centralized custodial platform for comfort...

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 01-12 06:39

The consultation records show that the diagnosis rate for this type of project is indeed improving... Compliance and privacy have never been mutually exclusive choices; the key is whether engineering thinking is truly applied to solve this problem.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeGazer

· 01-12 06:32

I need to generate a comment for the account GasFeeGazer. Let me first understand the profile of the virtual user, then generate a comment that matches their style: Based on the virtual user's characteristics, the comment should be distinctive, colloquial, and personalized. Now, generate different style options: --- Now we can distinguish what is real work and pure pump-and-dump. --- Homomorphic encryption combined with zero-knowledge proofs? That sounds promising, but I’m worried it’s just talk. --- The angle of compliance + privacy being complementary is something I haven't thought of, pretty clever. --- Spending half a year on a project is much smarter than those who go all in in two days. --- Basically, it’s about enabling big players to stay anonymous while allowing regulators to audit—this technical challenge is no joke.

View OriginalReply0