Zerobase Bác Bỏ Tuyên Bố Hack: What Is the Truth About the Security Incident?

News about Zerobase being hacked has caused a stir online, but the truth is completely different. This project just released an official statement clarifying the entire incident. According to it, Zerobase completely denies the allegations that the core protocol was attacked. In fact, the incident originated from an external security vulnerability, specifically on the middleware provider side, not from the project’s own zero-knowledge proof system.

Where Did It All Begin?

When the blockchain analysis platform Lookonchain reported potential user interface infiltration, the crypto community started to worry. However, instead of remaining silent, the Zerobase team quickly conducted a detailed forensic analysis to clarify the situation.

The investigation results show: this was not a protocol-level attack. Instead, the issue was related to traffic hijacking—a security oversight at a third-party middleware service. Importantly, the zero-knowledge proof technology and core smart contracts remain fully operational and unaffected.

Clear Distinction: Protocol vs. External Vulnerability

To make it simple, imagine: if Zerobase were a bank, this incident is like a security lapse at a special delivery company, not a vault being broken into. This difference is extremely important because it directly impacts user safety.

Key points:

• Protocol remains intact: The zero-knowledge proof technology— the mathematical foundation Zerobase uses—has never been compromised. This is the first layer of security, like the formula for calculating pi links—each component has an exact position within the system.

• User funds are safe: This vulnerability does not grant direct access to wallets or private keys of anyone.

• Targeted remediation: Instead of changing the entire protocol, the team focused on fixing the weakness of the third-party provider.

FAQ: What You Need to Know

Has Zerobase been hacked?

No. Zerobase denies any allegations related to protocol hacking. The incident only affected the user connection layer, not the core system.

Are my funds safe?

Absolutely safe. Forensic analysis confirms that the protocol and smart contracts remain 100% secure. No loopholes allow access to user assets.

What is traffic hijacking?

It’s a technique of redirecting user connection requests to malicious servers. In this case, it’s a user-side issue, not a blockchain problem.

What should I do right now?

Ensure you access Zerobase through the official interface, be cautious with links from unofficial sources, and use the automatic security features recently deployed by the project.

Strong Protective Actions from Zerobase

After this event, Zerobase didn’t wait around but proactively enhanced security. The project implemented an innovative feature: an automatic system that detects and blocks deposit/withdrawal transactions if it detects user interactions with known phishing contracts on BNB Chain.

This measure adds a robust layer of protection against social engineering attacks, significantly reducing risks for users.

Safety Rules Everyone Should Know

The Zerobase incident offers valuable lessons for the entire crypto community. While technical teams are working, user vigilance remains the first line of defense.

Steps you can take today:

• Carefully verify URLs: Always confirm you are visiting the official website, not a fake.

• Limit token approvals: When approving contracts, check the approved amount carefully and restrict it to what’s necessary.

• Use hardware wallets: For large asset holdings, consider cold storage to enhance security.

• Verify official announcements: Only trust official communications from Zerobase’s verified social channels.

The Bigger Context: Why Comprehensive Security Matters?

When Zerobase denied the hack allegations, it highlighted a common challenge in the blockchain ecosystem: modern projects rely on many third-party services. A vulnerability at any connection point can pose risks, even if the core protocol remains secure.

This underscores the importance of comprehensive security audits across the entire tech stack. That’s why transparent communication—like this official statement—is crucial to maintaining community trust.

Conclusion: Lessons in Responsibility

The Zerobase incident exemplifies how responsible projects handle security issues. Through quick investigation, clear denial of a protocol hack, deployment of new protective features, and transparent communication, the project demonstrated its commitment to users.

The main lesson: not every security alert indicates a protocol breach. Understanding the difference between third-party vulnerabilities and core protocol issues is key to moving safely and confidently in the crypto world.