Have you ever wondered why so many projects are now messing around with storage?



On the surface, Walrus Protocol is just another decentralized storage project. But to truly understand its significance, we need to look at it from the perspective of the entire Web3 ecosystem.

**The chain is under too much pressure**

Traditional public chain design follows a "unified" approach — it handles execution, maintains consensus, and bears the burden of data accumulation. What’s the result? Increasing costs, heavier loads, and bottlenecks when trying to scale.

Walrus’s approach is completely different. It offloads the "heavy data" from the chain and transfers it to a dedicated data layer optimized for large-scale data block processing. The chain itself only needs to handle verification and settlement.

It sounds simple, but this reallocation of responsibilities has a significant impact on the entire ecosystem — public chains run more smoothly, application development costs can be reduced, data remains verifiable, decentralization is maintained, and it’s still usable.

**Natural cooperation within the ecosystem**

Walrus is not an isolated experimental project. As a key part of the Mysten Labs ecosystem, it naturally forms synergy with high-performance public chains like Sui. One focuses on execution and settlement, while the other handles detailed data layer processing — each doing its part.

As more projects within the ecosystem adopt the "chain + data layer" pairing, Walrus’s network effects will truly explode. At that point, data division of labor will no longer be a feature of a single project but will become a standard configuration of the entire Web3 infrastructure.
SUI0,25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ClassicDumpstervip
· 12h ago
Uninstalling the data layer is indeed a viable approach, but the key is whether someone will actually adopt it. Can the Sui ecosystem succeed?
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHuntervip
· 01-13 00:51
I've heard the term "uninstalling the data layer" quite a few times, but few implementations are truly practical. Can Walrus pull it off?
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStakervip
· 01-13 00:51
so walrus is basically just offloading the bloat that chains have been stubbornly refusing to acknowledge... look, separation of concerns sounds clean on paper but we've seen this movie before with execution layers. network resilience hinges on actual validator adoption, not architectural elegance. how's the economic incentive structure looking here tbh
Reply0
zkProofGremlinvip
· 01-13 00:49
It sounds like the chain is too bloated and wants to slim down. Can this data layer logic be truly implemented, or is it just another shell game to deceive?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBardvip
· 01-13 00:48
To be honest, this layered logic is quite interesting. The chain offloads the burden to the data layer, each doing their own thing... But the problem is, who will ensure that this layer doesn't become the next centralized bottleneck?
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflowervip
· 01-13 00:29
Another layered narrative... but this time the logic really holds up; the chain has indeed been fed too much data.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)