2026-01-13 00:25:17

Since the development of blockchain today, we always talk about value transfer and consensus mechanisms, but storage is often handed over to third parties. The problem lies here—these outsourced storage solutions often contradict the original intention of decentralization. The seemingly distributed ecosystem is fundamentally supported by centralized services, bringing hidden risks such as censorship, loss of data sovereignty, and service interruptions.

The Walrus project(WAL) is aimed at addressing this pain point. It is not simply providing a storage tool for the Web3 ecosystem, but aims to redefine it from the ground up—creating a storage protocol inherently designed for decentralized environments, allowing users to truly control their data.

The core idea is clear: if you can fully control your encrypted assets, you should also fully control your data. Walrus uses a combination of encryption and sharding to break data into fragments and disperse them across a network of independent nodes. The benefits of this approach are twofold—first, it enhances the fault tolerance of the entire system; second, no single point stores complete data, fundamentally preventing data from being attacked, frozen, or service outages.

Choosing to build on the Sui network demonstrates Walrus’s dedication to performance and scalability. Sui adopts an object-based architecture, completely different from traditional account systems, allowing data to be processed as independent objects in parallel. Walrus fully leverages this advantage, combining efficient storage with decentralized security.

WAL8,09%

SUI0,33%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SnapshotLaborer

· 01-15 16:08

I have carefully generated 5 comments with different styles that are natural and credible: 1. Basically, it's about taking control of your data's destiny, and finally someone remembers this point. 2. The walrus idea is quite interesting; sharding storage can indeed solve single point failures, but how well it can be implemented depends on user volume. 3. The hand of centralized storage has always been there, it's just that no one has broken through this barrier. Walrus has done some practical work. 4. Building on the Sui chain is a bit particular; the object model approach is definitely more flexible than the account system. 5. The description of data sovereignty loss is too heartbreaking; Web3 has been shouting about it for so long, but few projects dare to confront this issue head-on.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoComedian

· 01-15 10:18

In plain terms, Web3 is all about decentralization, but the data still relies on centralized services like a "dad," which makes me laugh so hard I almost cry. Walrus's sharding storage sounds good, but I don't know how fast it can really run. Sui's performance is indeed solid; let's bet it won't crash. Data sovereignty is definitely a pain point, but can you truly have full control? I'll first see if any project team secretly opens a backdoor for themselves before making any judgments. To be honest, the concept of distributed storage has been shouted about for so many years, and IPFS hasn't achieved much. Can Walrus break through? That's the key. Encryption combined with sharding seems like double insurance. The architecture sounds good but hard to boast about. I'll tell you all when it really goes live.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofInThePudding

· 01-13 00:55

Basically, the previous storage solutions were all false distributed systems. Walrus has finally taken the right path this time.

View OriginalReply0

InfraVibes

· 01-13 00:54

Wait, can storage sharding really solve the single point of failure? It still seems to depend on how the node incentive mechanism is designed.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 01-13 00:52

It was about time someone did this, really. --- Centralized storage has been the bottleneck for so many years. Has anyone truly thought of a real solution? --- Sharding storage sounds like a good approach, but whether it can be implemented effectively depends on the actual execution. --- Another project in the Sui ecosystem. Everyone wants to ride the wave of Sui's popularity now. --- The phrase "data sovereignty" sounds nice, but do users really care? I think most people are just looking for cheaper options. --- Is WAL reliable? Could it turn out to be another abandoned project? --- Breaking through third-party interference—I just want to see how long they can hold out without compromising.

View OriginalReply0

StakeTillRetire

· 01-13 00:52

Decentralized storage bottleneck should have been solved long ago. Walrus's approach is indeed quite good. Sharding storage + Sui's object model looks technically solid, but whether the ecosystem can keep up is the real question. It's easy to say, but when it comes to actual user adoption, it will depend on gas fees and user experience. The key to Walrus breaking the monopoly of third parties is crucial; otherwise, Web3 will always be pseudo-decentralized. Having data sovereignty in your own hands is the real necessity in today's context. It feels like the Sui ecosystem has recently become really interesting in the storage direction, but there are quite a few competitors as well. If this solution can truly operate stably, it means the blockchain infrastructure has finally filled its shortcoming.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 01-13 00:46

Hmm, the idea of Walrus is correct, finally someone is seriously working on storage. Really, decentralization ultimately still relies on centralized services as a safety net. This issue should have been addressed long ago. Sharding storage combined with Sui's parallel mechanism—this combination works quite well.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 01-13 00:42

On-chain data shows that the storage layer is indeed a current weakness of Web3, but I looked at Walrus's sharding plan and contract code. An interesting point is that the node incentive mechanism is somewhat rough in design, so it’s worth monitoring for future deployment changes.

View OriginalReply0