Spend over a decade grinding at a traditional automaker. Early mornings, overtime shifts, endless meetings, constant pressure—you live and breathe the company. Then one day you step back and check the numbers.
The past 10 years tell a brutal story: • Ford: +17% • General Motors: +179% • Tesla: +3,190%
Yes, you read that right. Not a typo.
This gap isn't just about stock price charts—it reflects how different business models respond to technological disruption. While legacy automakers optimized for the old playbook, Tesla fundamentally rewrote the rules. Same decade, same market conditions, completely different outcomes.
It's a reminder that capital flows toward innovation. Not because of luck, but because the market ruthlessly rewards those who see the future first and act accordingly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Vaccinated
· 01-15 06:33
That 3190% from Tesla is really incredible, ten years of wasted effort, bro.
View OriginalReply0
SelfRugger
· 01-13 16:53
After ten years of effort, it's still just a fraction of what others have innovated in a few years—that's the reality.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 01-13 00:57
Ten years of youth invested, and when I checked the data, I was immediately overwhelmed... Tesla's 3190% return is really no joke, right?
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 01-13 00:50
After ten years of effort, I'm still not as good as a new force. Truly impressive.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casino
· 01-13 00:41
Ten years of grinding for traditional car companies, and when you look back at the stock price increase, it's no wonder people can't stay positive...
Once you understand it, being on the right trend is much more effective than stubbornly sticking to the old ways.
Is this number real? Over 3000 points... unbelievable.
Innovation is indeed the best investment, but unfortunately most people are on the wrong side.
That's why I now only look at trends, not history...
The same ten years but different endings—it's not about the effort level at all.
Tesla really outpaced everyone this time; starting from zero, they didn't carry as many burdens.
The 3000-fold gap between Ford and GM is a bit ruthless...
Effort without direction is just a waste of time, and this story makes that very clear.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearcher
· 01-13 00:41
Based on on-chain data and historical backtesting, this case perfectly illustrates the incompatibility problem of incentive mechanisms. The profit curve for traditional automaker employees is severely decoupled from the company's innovation speed, whereas Tesla's token economics design (though it is equity, the logic is similar) aligns interests. This is why governance structure determines everything.
Spend over a decade grinding at a traditional automaker. Early mornings, overtime shifts, endless meetings, constant pressure—you live and breathe the company. Then one day you step back and check the numbers.
The past 10 years tell a brutal story:
• Ford: +17%
• General Motors: +179%
• Tesla: +3,190%
Yes, you read that right. Not a typo.
This gap isn't just about stock price charts—it reflects how different business models respond to technological disruption. While legacy automakers optimized for the old playbook, Tesla fundamentally rewrote the rules. Same decade, same market conditions, completely different outcomes.
It's a reminder that capital flows toward innovation. Not because of luck, but because the market ruthlessly rewards those who see the future first and act accordingly.