2026-01-13 00:30:43

When it comes to navigating the market right now, you've essentially got three paths to consider:

One approach is scalping—working the shorter timeframe moves, maybe 5% swings here and there. It's active and keeps you engaged, though the grind can wear on you.

Then there's the patient angle: wait for Bitcoin to punch through 94k convincingly. Don't chase it before then. Just sit tight on the sidelines. Honestly, this might be the smartest play if you're unsure about momentum.

Or you could go the steady route—buy in now and layer your position over time through dollar-cost averaging. Lower risk per entry, but it means committing capital incrementally as prices move.

Each has its trade-offs depending on your risk tolerance and time commitment. The key is picking one that matches your style rather than ping-ponging between all three.

BTC-0,22%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-a606bf0c

· 01-15 22:31

I really can't do short-term trading. My hands are itching, but I always chase highs and sell lows... I'll just wait patiently for 94k. Anyway, the market is a bit confusing right now.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-40edb63b

· 01-15 02:01

Hey, it sounds nice, but how many people can truly stick to it without wavering? The short-term strategies have long been played out, and frequent opening and closing positions eat up the fees really badly. Regarding the 94k level, I think I still need to wait; anyway, I don't lack this little bit of time. Dollar-cost averaging is the most stable approach, but you need patience and spare funds; otherwise, your mindset will collapse. My experience is, once you've made your choice, don't look back. The worst thing is to keep changing your mind repeatedly.

View OriginalReply0

YieldChaser

· 01-14 18:27

Really, the 94k level must be defended; chasing the rise now is just giving away money --- A 5% short-term gain sounds simple, but in reality, the mentality can break faster than the price moves --- The most stable way is dollar-cost averaging; it’s a test of human nature --- I still think we should wait; those chasing the rise are all crying --- Matching your style is very important; don’t follow the trend, it’s easy to get cut --- Instead of wavering, it’s better to set a target and hold firm --- Short-term trading is really exhausting and not suitable for working people --- If you can’t break 94k, don’t move recklessly; that’s the truth --- Dollar-cost averaging + watching the market, I like this combo

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 01-13 19:27

Honestly, the short-term trading approach is too exhausting, watching the market all day long makes my brain want to explode... It's more reliable to wait for the 94k level. The most uncomfortable thing is indecision—sometimes chasing the rise, sometimes dollar-cost averaging, which messes with my mindset. DCA is really the best plan for lazy people; gradually getting in without constantly worrying. A 5% short-term gain is tempting, but once you pay the fees, it's gone haha. Instead of messing around aimlessly, it's better to set a strategy and stick to it—this is the right way to make money.

View OriginalReply0

ContractHunter

· 01-13 01:00

The short-term approach is really exhausting. I still believe in waiting for a breakthrough at the 94k level. Instead of watching the market every day, it's better to invest spare funds gradually.

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet

· 01-13 01:00

To be honest, I've played the short-term game before, but it's like cutting my own hand... The 94k level is really tough to break through, but I still choose to dollar-cost average. Anyway, lying flat is the most comfortable.

View OriginalReply0

notSatoshi1971

· 01-13 00:58

Is that 5% short-term profit really worth watching the market every day? I'm a bit tired of it. Wait until 94k to act; I'll choose to lie low and observe this wave. Dollar-cost averaging is easy to say but hard to do; persistence is the most difficult part. Don't always think about eating a big meal at once; entering in phases is the right way. Speaking of which, choosing among these three paths really depends on whether you have the patience. Chasing the rally at 94k is just giving away money; be clear-headed. Dollar-cost averaging supporters, stop bragging; the key is whether you can really stick with it.

View OriginalReply0

NervousFingers

· 01-13 00:58

The short-term approach really isn't suitable for me; I lose everything with a single shake of the hand. Let's see if 94k breaks first. DCA is the most comfortable, but you have to resist the urge to look at the K-line—it's a test of human nature. I'm a bit stuck with decision paralysis this time, but wavering is definitely the quickest way to lose money. Wait for 94k; anyway, chasing the rally now is just playing with fire. DCA + holding, everything else is playing with fire; we don't have that reaction speed.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOrektGuy

· 01-13 00:52

Honestly, I've given up on short-term trading long ago. Watching the market every day is exhausting. Now I'm just waiting for the critical point at 94k; if it doesn't break, I won't move. It feels like the safest strategy.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-13 00:36

94k is really the critical threshold. I'm waiting right now, holding USDT without moving. I've tried the short-term approach, and it's really exhausting. Not only do I not make many points, but I also mess up my mindset. DCA (Dollar-Cost Averaging) is the way to go; gradual entry is stable.

View OriginalReply0