2026-01-13 00:36:04

When researching crypto trading and developing custom indicators, I have used many AI assistants to handle complex tasks—from writing code to building Pine Script indicators and market analysis. The differences are quite obvious: top-tier performers demonstrate consistent accuracy in coding and logical understanding, mid-range tools perform reasonably well but are less efficient than the former, and poor options tend to fail when handling professional requirements. The core behind this is—data volume. The quality of AI models ultimately depends on the scale and quality of training data. Players who master high-quality data sources naturally have models that outperform their peers. For us traders, the key when choosing tools is not the brand, but the actual output.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaNeighbor

· 01-13 00:59

Not necessarily. I've tried several options, and sometimes the cheaper ones work better than the expensive ones. Data volume is indeed important, but user experience can also determine success or failure. AI writing Pine Script is really convenient, saving me a lot of time, but sometimes the logic still has issues. Choosing tools mainly depends on practical performance; no matter how good the hype, it’s useless. Among these AI assistants, there’s actually no absolute winner; it depends on the scenario. The key is to be able to identify bugs in AI outputs yourself, or you'll end up getting scammed.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-74b10196

· 01-13 00:56

Data is king, and that's no joke. The quality of AI tools depends on what they are fed. Well said, reliable tools can indeed save a lot of trouble. Different AIs vary greatly; I've also stepped on some pits. I've used Pine Script as well; the top-tier ones are stable, others are really disappointing. Data quality determines the ceiling; this is the harsh reality. Have you tried poor tools? Debugging code with them can drive you crazy. Choosing tools depends on output; branding is indeed superficial. It seems most people are still following the trend of buying tools without considering this layer. Mastering good data sources definitely gives you a lead.

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 01-13 00:51

Data is king, there's no doubt about that. To be honest, after using so many AI tools, I can truly feel the difference... Some write code like a beginner, while others are spot on. The key still depends on whether the training data is solid enough, I have deep experience with this. Complex logic in Pine Script, garbage code generated by inferior tools can be infuriating, top-tier tools handle it in minutes, vastly more efficient. So, don't be brainwashed by brands; looking at actual output is the real deal. Hey, isn't this just saying that data quality determines everything? The same applies to trading. By the way, has anyone used reliable Pine Script generation tools? Please recommend.

View OriginalReply0

MrDecoder

· 01-13 00:47

Data is king; all the branding is just superficial. --- Exactly, after using so much AI, you still have to see if the actual code running is reliable. --- The Pine Script part really makes a big difference; top-tier logic is instantly understood, but a poor one can fail just by changing a parameter. --- Ultimately, it's the different data fed in; garbage in, garbage out. --- Having a quality data source is truly a moat; no wonder some tools outperform others. --- You can't just rely on marketing in trading; you need to try it yourself to know your level. --- Mastering a good data source can indeed give you a competitive edge; that point is well made. --- Real skill is in delivering solid results; everything else is superficial. --- It feels like the quality gap among AI tools is becoming more and more obvious; choosing the wrong one is just a waste of time. --- That's why I still prefer to use those few reliable ones; more doesn't help.

View OriginalReply0