Recently, security researchers conducted an in-depth test of the privacy application SHDW within the Solana ecosystem and discovered several serious functional flaws.
First, privacy protection is essentially a facade. As a privacy-focused application, SHDW's transfer function surprisingly does not implement true encryption protection, which directly contradicts the core promise of the product. Second, funds used by users for exchanges have become unretrievable, meaning users' assets could be locked.
Even more concerning is that the project plans to issue a new token today. At this critical juncture, the user support experience of the application is extremely poor— the system merely vaguely prompts users to contact "customer service" without providing any practical support channels or official communication methods. When issues arise with the product, users cannot find effective help.
Given the questions surrounding the product's legality and security, investors and users are advised to remain vigilant and thoroughly assess the risks before participating.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTears
· 20m ago
Laughing out loud, privacy apps can't even protect privacy, isn't this just a joke?
---
Locking funds and issuing tokens? I've seen this trick too many times.
---
Want to list a coin without customer support channels? Brothers, you're asking for it.
---
SHDW's move is truly suicidal; who would still dare to buy?
---
It's incredible—core features are all fake, yet they still call it a privacy app.
---
The coin hasn't even been issued yet and it's already a rug pull; this is going to be interesting.
---
Transferring without encryption and talking to me about privacy—who are you fooling?
---
If you can't withdraw funds, the SEC will come after you.
---
I really don't understand this kind of project; why are people still willing to take over?
---
A typical pre-rug night, just waiting to see the show.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 01-13 02:02
Privacy apps surprisingly not encrypted? Isn't this a joke? And they still dare to issue tokens...
Funds are locked, customer service is virtually nonexistent, this pace is making me a bit overwhelmed.
SHDW really underperformed this time; who would dare to buy in at this point?
Where is the promised privacy? Is this it?
Wait, are they still launching tokens today? Bro, this is probably a suicidal move.
Daring to let users deposit money without a withdrawal channel—I've never seen such an operation.
Another Web3 project crash site; I'm already mentally exhausted.
Privacy in the privacy app is gone; the irony is spot on.
Can't even find customer service, how to solve technical issues? And they still want to profit?
This is why I am now skeptical about new projects.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 01-13 01:23
Privacy apps lack even basic encryption; this is not a flaw, it's a mockery. Before launching tokens, there's not even a decent customer service channel, and users' funds are locked... How many "lessons from the past" of projects does it take to piece this together?
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 01-13 01:23
Privacy apps can't even handle privacy well, it's hilarious, this is outrageous. Still dare to issue tokens today? Not afraid of running away after getting exploited?
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 01-13 01:22
Privacy can't be private, funds can't be withdrawn, tokens still need to be issued. This operation is really crazy, it made me laugh to death.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrender
· 01-13 00:56
Privacy is a sham, and funds are still locked. How dare you issue a coin? That's hilarious. Truly bold.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarian
· 01-13 00:56
Privacy is just a facade, and you still dare to issue tokens? Isn't this just harvesting profits? The funds are still locked, it's hilarious.
Recently, security researchers conducted an in-depth test of the privacy application SHDW within the Solana ecosystem and discovered several serious functional flaws.
First, privacy protection is essentially a facade. As a privacy-focused application, SHDW's transfer function surprisingly does not implement true encryption protection, which directly contradicts the core promise of the product. Second, funds used by users for exchanges have become unretrievable, meaning users' assets could be locked.
Even more concerning is that the project plans to issue a new token today. At this critical juncture, the user support experience of the application is extremely poor— the system merely vaguely prompts users to contact "customer service" without providing any practical support channels or official communication methods. When issues arise with the product, users cannot find effective help.
Given the questions surrounding the product's legality and security, investors and users are advised to remain vigilant and thoroughly assess the risks before participating.