2026-01-13 01:28:05

A recent buying strategy of a leading wallet is worth noting — the average entry price is stuck around the $38K USD range. The movements of such large holdings often reflect certain market signals. From the wallet's on-chain activity, the timing and scale of this transaction are quite interesting.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StopLossMaster

· 6h ago

38K is the level... smart money is positioning again.

View OriginalReply0

MelonField

· 01-13 01:55

The 38K level is indeed intriguing; big players wouldn't act without reason.

View OriginalReply0

WalletManager

· 01-13 01:44

38K this level is honestly quite interesting. The entry logic of big players needs to be analyzed. Holding tight to the chips is the real deal. Look at the on-chain data trends. Average cost is at this point? I bet they know something we don't. For a position of this size, private key management must use multi-signature solutions. Has the contract been audited? I always feel there's a story behind the big players' actions.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 01-13 01:44

38k entry point? that's not random, ngl... someone's playing 4d chess with the order book rn. the fact that it's *exactly* in that zone tells me we're watching real accumulation, not noise. statistically speaking, that's too clean to be coincidence - smells like someone knows something about support levels we haven't priced in yet

Reply0

GateUser-9f682d4c

· 01-13 01:42

There is indeed a saying about the 38K level; the movements of big players never lie.

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 01-13 01:37

38k entry? Honestly, I think this guy is a bit of a gambler. Either he's extremely optimistic, or he's been trapped and keeps adding to his position.

View OriginalReply0