2026-01-13 01:34:15

This IP-level project looks promising, but the issue lies in the holding strategy. That big investor took a 10% share but failed to seize the opportunity. Logically, this proportion should have already earned them over a million in profit.

What is the core problem? Overly粗放 (rough or careless) position management. If only they had diversified their holdings a bit, knowing when to cut losses and when to add positions, they would have been able to turn passivity into主动 (initiative). Instead, the entire strategy followed the trend, copying others' routines, and as a result, they took a tumble.

This is why some people can't make money — it's not that the project is bad, but that they ruin their own game. Market opportunities are always there; it all depends on whether you can seize them.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WhaleWatcher

· 3h ago

In simple terms, it's like holding good cards but playing them poorly. Who told you to follow the trend? --- 10% of the shares didn't make any money. How capable do you have to be to do that? --- As always, making money is never about choosing the right project; it's about execution. --- If you can't even understand basic concepts like diversification, who can you blame? --- Instead of researching projects, it's better to first study your own mindset. --- The most outrageous thing about big traders crashing is that they have the best conditions but the worst results. --- Following strategies blindly is the same as having no strategy at all. Everyone knows that. --- Missing out on millions of opportunities right in front of you—don't even mention this kind of operation. --- The market gives opportunities, but people can't give themselves opportunities—that's so true. --- Having too concentrated a position can indeed lead to problems, but did those big traders who hold 10% think about diversification? --- I've heard too many stories of someone falling down after a single misstep.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 01-14 16:33

Basically, it's a mental breakdown. Holding chips and still following the trend—you're asking for trouble. Can't even hold 10%, which shows a lack of awareness. It's time to reflect. Some people are just born to be leeks; no matter how good the cards are, they can't play them well. The key is execution. Most people's shortcomings lie in this area. It's not that the project is bad; it's that the operator is bad. Two different things.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSourGrape

· 01-13 01:57

If only I had diversified my positions back then, now it's too late to say anything. Even big players have their day of failure.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHermit

· 01-13 01:56

Honestly, holding large chips can still lead to losses—how capable do you have to be? But on the other hand, these big investors are really just dealing with mindset issues. Really, managing positions is actually simple—diversify holdings, dollar-cost averaging, and have a plan. But what happens? People still follow the herd and end up in a trap. So, sometimes it's not the project itself that’s the problem; it's just that you don't know how to play the game.

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal

· 01-13 01:40

Honestly, holding a good hand and still playing like this is truly outrageous. Not making any money with a 10% share, you must be really discouraged.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSurfer

· 01-13 01:37

Basically, it's greed that knows no bounds, like a snake swallowing an elephant. With only 10% of the chips, the holdings are already ruined. These big players are the funniest—they have money but no brains, still suffering heavy losses. Can't even understand the basics like splitting positions—serves them right.

View OriginalReply0