#Solana行情走势解读 The U.S. Congress is about to face a critical vote, and the future direction of the cryptocurrency industry could be reshaped within the next 72 hours.
The Senate is scheduled to vote on the Digital Asset Market Structure Act, and this vote carries significance far beyond mere regulation—it marks a turning point in the industry's evolution from wild growth to institutionalization.
The core highlight of this bill is its direct confrontation with the industry's biggest pain points. For years, the boundaries between securities tokens and commodity tokens have been blurred, and the division of authority between the SEC and CFTC has been a tangled mess. The bill explicitly states: to clarify the classification standards for these two types of tokens and define the responsibilities of the two major regulatory agencies. In other words, the chaotic situation of "enforcement replacing regulation" may be replaced by a proper legal framework.
If the bill passes smoothly, the subsequent market reaction could be quite significant. Channels for institutional funds to enter will be opened, and compliant exchanges and asset custody services will see a development window. More importantly, traditional financial institutions will accelerate their deployment in digital assets.
However, to be honest, there will definitely be some short-term pain. Some provisions of the bill are still subject to debate, and certain projects may need to adjust their operations. But this "pain" precisely reflects the industry's inevitable path toward maturity.
Global attention is focused on Washington. This vote will not only determine the future of the U.S. market but is also likely to serve as a reference model for global cryptocurrency regulation. Every step in the next three days warrants close attention. What do you think—will this bill ultimately pass smoothly?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GamefiEscapeArtist
· 21h ago
So basically, it means we all need to become compliant, in other words, another way to harvest retail investors.
But it would be good if they could truly draw a clear line between securities and commodities, at least better than the SEC's arbitrary lawsuits now.
I doubt this bill can really pass, or is it just another empty promise?
Institutional entry? Ha, they've already been laying out plans in the shadows, just waiting for the bill to be approved.
Let's wait and see in these three days. Anyway, I've already cashed out my coins, so whatever happens, it's none of my business.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperer
· 21h ago
Hmm... Can we really get through this time? It feels like Washington folks are about to start bickering again.
The bad news—when will it arrive? I'm just waiting to buy the dip.
Once the bill passes and institutions enter the market, will my small coins be doomed?
Honestly, it's still a gamble on politics. Who knows which senator might suddenly change their mind?
Is the SEC finally going to shut up? I don't believe it.
Deciding the industry's future in 72 hours is a bit exaggerated, but I will still keep a close eye.
As long as they don't ban usage, everything else is easy to discuss.
You're discussing the bill, and I'm wondering if this is just another ploy to cut the leeks.
Regulation sounds good, but in reality, it's just a legal way to harvest retail investors.
The real alpha isn't in these news stories; it's in a new coin in some small corner.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeIt
· 21h ago
Washington is up to something again. Can they really give a clear statement this time?
---
It's all just empty words; the key depends on how the people on the chair vote.
---
Regulators come, and then the institutions follow—this logic makes sense... but what about us retail investors?
---
They talk a lot of fancy words, but in the end, we're still the ones getting cut.
---
Change the world in 72 hours, I think... but it probably takes another 72 weeks.
---
Why do I always feel like this is paving the way for the big players?
---
Whether it passes or not, someone makes money—just not sure who loses, haha.
---
The legal framework sounds good, but how about the implementation?
---
Both SEC and CFTC—neither is reliable.
---
I just want to know if SOL will take off directly after passing.
---
The meaning of "institutionalized evolution" is that small coins have no future, right?
---
No matter what is said, it's all in vain—just political games.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryBaby
· 21h ago
What can change in 72 hours? Wake up, everyone, Washington folks aren't as efficient as you think.
Here comes another round of "regulatory good news" stories. Let's wait until it actually happens—I don't believe it.
SEC and CFTC clarifying their authority? Ha, they haven't even figured it out themselves. The bill is the real clarity.
It sounds great, but I just want to know which coins will be sentenced to death when the time comes. Don't just talk about the good ones.
Institutional funds? Please, don't rush it now. If it really happens, I'll chase after it. It's still early.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 21h ago
Is it a matter of life or death in 72 hours? I think this time, it's probably going to be a tug-of-war again, Washington never fails to disappoint with repeated moves.
Have you ever thought that if it actually passes, it might just be the beginning of a nightmare... a bunch of projects could die.
The SEC has long wanted to clamp down on this industry, how could this bill be beneficial to us?
Regulation will cause the price to drop, institutional investors coming in will also push the price down; anyway, retail investors like us are just stepping stones.
But on the other hand, if Solana can take off during this wave, that would be great—it's all about Washington's speed of action.
Three days? Well, I went all-in three days ago, now I can only pray I don't get liquidated.
Honestly, this bill is just a green light for big institutions; us small retail investors shouldn't think too much.
#Solana行情走势解读 The U.S. Congress is about to face a critical vote, and the future direction of the cryptocurrency industry could be reshaped within the next 72 hours.
The Senate is scheduled to vote on the Digital Asset Market Structure Act, and this vote carries significance far beyond mere regulation—it marks a turning point in the industry's evolution from wild growth to institutionalization.
The core highlight of this bill is its direct confrontation with the industry's biggest pain points. For years, the boundaries between securities tokens and commodity tokens have been blurred, and the division of authority between the SEC and CFTC has been a tangled mess. The bill explicitly states: to clarify the classification standards for these two types of tokens and define the responsibilities of the two major regulatory agencies. In other words, the chaotic situation of "enforcement replacing regulation" may be replaced by a proper legal framework.
If the bill passes smoothly, the subsequent market reaction could be quite significant. Channels for institutional funds to enter will be opened, and compliant exchanges and asset custody services will see a development window. More importantly, traditional financial institutions will accelerate their deployment in digital assets.
However, to be honest, there will definitely be some short-term pain. Some provisions of the bill are still subject to debate, and certain projects may need to adjust their operations. But this "pain" precisely reflects the industry's inevitable path toward maturity.
Global attention is focused on Washington. This vote will not only determine the future of the U.S. market but is also likely to serve as a reference model for global cryptocurrency regulation. Every step in the next three days warrants close attention. What do you think—will this bill ultimately pass smoothly?