2026-01-13 02:20:26

Key shift in the global economic dialogue: policymakers are leaning toward smart derisking rather than full decoupling. What does this mean for critical minerals? There's growing consensus that nations need to strengthen supply chain resilience, especially for resources essential to tech infrastructure and blockchain networks. The focus is on building redundancy and diversification—not cutting ties completely. This approach could reshape how we think about global resources and dependencies in the Web3 era.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkPrince

· 14h ago

Smart risk reduction sounds good, but in the end, isn't it just major countries competing for mining rights? True decentralization still depends on Web3.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 14h ago

Smart derisking sounds good, but can it really be implemented? It still feels like each country is doing its own thing.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretter

· 15h ago

Smart derisking sounds good, but in reality? We'll still be held back, right?

View OriginalReply0

orphaned_block

· 15h ago

Forget it, derisking sounds fancy but it's just a rebranding and politicization; real supply chain resilience isn't something that can be bought with money.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeTrustFund

· 15h ago

Listening closely, well, isn't this exactly what I've been saying all along? The decoupling approach is outdated; smart derisking is the way to go.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerPrivateKey

· 15h ago

Smart derisking sounds good, but in reality, everyone still does their own thing, and the bottleneck problem in mineral resources has not been solved at all.

View OriginalReply0