Regarding the phrase "blockchain disrupting finance," we've heard it enough times. But frankly, most projects either overhype or just talk without action. Today, I want to introduce a project called DUSK, which takes a different approach — it doesn't loudly claim to disrupt anything, but instead focuses on a more practical issue: how to enable privacy and compliance to coexist within the same system.



At first glance, it seems like an impossible contradiction. But think about it — this is actually a pain point that digital finance cannot avoid.

**The Dilemma of Privacy and Regulation**

When making a transaction, you don't want the whole network to know your account balance or who you're trading with. But on the other hand, you need to be able to prove to relevant authorities that the transaction is legal. On current public blockchains? Almost impossible.

Privacy coins on the market all pursue "complete anonymity," but as a result, they can't be used in compliant scenarios. Conversely, those claiming to be compliant often require you to hand over all your data.

DUSK aims to take a third path. It uses cutting-edge technology like zero-knowledge proofs, allowing you to prove to regulators that your transaction is legitimate without revealing all the details. In other words, you can demonstrate the legality of your transaction while protecting your privacy.

**More Than Just a Token Project**

Many people see DUSK as just a token. But in reality, its true value lies in the underlying protocol — a blockchain infrastructure specifically designed for financial scenarios.

Its clear goal is to become the foundational support for security token issuance, privacy DeFi, institutional clearing and settlement, and more. This means enterprises can issue compliant digital assets without exposing their trade secrets. Ordinary users can participate in DeFi without worrying about their entire financial history being exposed.

This direction is worth paying attention to now because it addresses real, urgent problems.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ProofOfNothingvip
· 14h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound high-end, but what about real-world applications? Can institutions really get on board? Can privacy and compliance coexist? That idea might be a bit naive—ultimately, who will make concessions? It's not just project teams blowing smoke; users are overthinking it. DUSK is also uncertain about its prospects. It feels similar to Monero's approach, just with an added compliance shell. It's called the third way in a nice way, but in reality, it's just compromises on both sides. Truly private coins should have been phased out long ago. Is the underlying infrastructure impressive? Talent is the key—currently, the ecosystem hasn't really taken off. Security tokens do have potential, but regulatory attitudes are still unclear.
View OriginalReply0
LightningPacketLossvip
· 14h ago
Alright, finally there's a project that doesn't hype up "disruption." I have to give DUSK a thumbs up for that. The zero-knowledge proof system is indeed ingenious. Can privacy and compliance really be achieved simultaneously? I'm quite interested in learning more. Wait, has this infrastructure actually been implemented? Is theory enough?
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRidervip
· 14h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed impressive, but could they still become just a gimmick to scam retail investors? The idea behind DUSK is quite clear-minded, better than those boastful projects. Finally, someone is serious about doing real work, but is the path of compliance really easy? Can privacy and regulation truly be balanced? It still depends on how it's implemented. If it can be realized, that would be awesome. Right now, it's all just hype. After hearing about zero-knowledge proofs a hundred times, I just want to see who can actually implement it. You're right, most projects just hype it up. This direction is worth keeping an eye on. Institution-level demand definitely exists, but whether it can be met depends on the development progress. It feels like DUSK is more pragmatic in problem-solving, but whether it can hold up after launch is another matter. Finally, there's a project that no longer promotes disruption but is thinking about how to do it.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 14h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but can they really be implemented? That's the key. No hype, no hype—privacy and compliance are indeed a deadlock, and DUSK has thought it through. Another "underlying infrastructure"? Let's see if anyone actually uses it. This approach is much more reliable than those projects that shout "disruption" every day; at least it's not just hype. A compliant privacy coin... sounds contradictory, but the demand is real.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxietyvip
· 14h ago
Really? Zero-knowledge proofs can balance privacy and compliance, sounds like a scam. But on the other hand, finally a project dares to tackle this topic head-on. Stop bragging all the time. Wait, can this really pass regulatory scrutiny? It still feels uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
StakeHouseDirectorvip
· 14h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly exceptional, far better than those who boast every day. --- Can privacy and compliance really be achieved simultaneously? Let's wait and see. --- Finally, there's a project that doesn't just talk the talk; I respect this approach. --- That's a pretty good point, but can dusk really be implemented? I'm worried. --- This is a pragmatic idea, unlike some projects that keep dreaming every day. --- It sounds interesting. How is the progress on the underlying protocol? --- Honestly, privacy and regulation are a deadlock; I'm paying close attention to anyone trying to reconcile them. --- Another new concept? Let's wait for the data to speak. --- Institution-level clearing and settlement? If they can really pull it off, it could be a breakthrough.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuruvip
· 14h ago
Finally, someone is not bragging. This idea really needs some thought. Can privacy and compliance really be achieved simultaneously? If it's reliable, I would go all in. The set of zero-knowledge proofs sounds mysterious, but practical implementation is the real key. It's not a token project, but infrastructure? Then I need to take another look at this thing. I've been hearing about compliant DeFi for so many years, and this time feels like the closest yet. By the way, why is the name DUSK so low-key? If they had a better marketing team, it could skyrocket. There are plenty of privacy coins, but few can truly meet regulatory requirements at the same time. This direction is correct. Wait, can this protocol really be used now, or is it just another hype?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt