In the cryptocurrency market, projects vary greatly in quality. How can investors distinguish between them? Here are five golden evaluation principles. Strictly follow this framework to screen projects, and you can avoid most pitfalls.
**1. Complete Decentralization**. A genuine project should have no control by a project team, initiated by an anonymous community, with contract permissions fully relinquished. Only then can the risk of rug pulls be fundamentally eliminated.
**2. No Front-Running**. Examine the founding team and early holders' lock-up situations to see if hidden interest groups are secretly selling off. Transparent initial distribution is crucial.
**3. Innovative Mechanisms**. Projects that merely copy existing models are difficult to sustain long-term. Truly noteworthy are those with unique designs, logically consistent economic models, and mechanisms that support reasonable price appreciation.
**4. Contract Security**. Code audits, permission configurations, upgrade mechanisms—these technical details directly relate to fund safety. A single oversight can lead to a fatal vulnerability.
**5. Solid Community Consensus**. Long-term commitment to community building, transparency of information, and regular interaction make a project more resilient.
Use these five criteria to evaluate projects, and you can avoid over 99% of traps.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterWang
· 20h ago
That's very true, but I don't think there are many projects in reality that accomplish these five points; most are still various variants of Ponzi schemes.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 20h ago
ngl the "99% trap avoidance" claim is... statistically improbable. seen too many projects tick all 5 boxes then implode anyway. audit alone doesn't mean squat if the team's anon for a reason, trust but verify x3 here.
Reply0
LidoStakeAddict
· 20h ago
That's quite true, but in practice, nine out of ten people can't do it... Truly decentralized projects are rare, most are wolves in sheep's clothing.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamBreaker
· 20h ago
That's true, but I've seen too many projects claiming to be "decentralized" that still end up scamming investors.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_vibing
· 20h ago
It sounds good, but very few projects actually implement these 5 points.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemist
· 20h ago
It sounds good, but I've seen too many projects that secretly manipulate under the banner of decentralization... This theory sounds profound, but practical experience is the only true test of truth.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapy
· 21h ago
After all this talk, I haven't really seen many projects that can truly accomplish these 5 points.
In the cryptocurrency market, projects vary greatly in quality. How can investors distinguish between them? Here are five golden evaluation principles. Strictly follow this framework to screen projects, and you can avoid most pitfalls.
**1. Complete Decentralization**. A genuine project should have no control by a project team, initiated by an anonymous community, with contract permissions fully relinquished. Only then can the risk of rug pulls be fundamentally eliminated.
**2. No Front-Running**. Examine the founding team and early holders' lock-up situations to see if hidden interest groups are secretly selling off. Transparent initial distribution is crucial.
**3. Innovative Mechanisms**. Projects that merely copy existing models are difficult to sustain long-term. Truly noteworthy are those with unique designs, logically consistent economic models, and mechanisms that support reasonable price appreciation.
**4. Contract Security**. Code audits, permission configurations, upgrade mechanisms—these technical details directly relate to fund safety. A single oversight can lead to a fatal vulnerability.
**5. Solid Community Consensus**. Long-term commitment to community building, transparency of information, and regular interaction make a project more resilient.
Use these five criteria to evaluate projects, and you can avoid over 99% of traps.