The devil in the financial markets often hides in the details. Imagine this scenario: a node operator of a certain oracle manually updates price data, and an accidental typo causes the BNB quote to become $0.000006—an asset originally valued at $600 suddenly marked as nearly zero. What happens when this absurd number is pushed onto the chain? Smart contracts have no compassion; they only see the data. Once a collapse in collateral value is detected, the liquidation engine immediately kicks in. Your position is gone within seconds. By the time the error is discovered and corrected, it’s already too late—the transactions on the blockchain cannot be rolled back.



Such "fat-finger" errors are common in financial history, but in the on-chain world, they are amplified infinitely. That’s why we must take them seriously.

**How can oracles defend against such basic errors?**

The core solution is multi-signature (Multisig) combined with a decentralized oracle network. For example, solutions like Chainlink do not rely on a single node’s quote but aggregate data from multiple independent nodes. When one node reports $0.000006 and others report $600, a median algorithm automatically filters out this anomaly. Probabilistically, the chance of multiple nodes erring simultaneously drops exponentially.

But that’s not enough. As a user, my response plan is more straightforward:

**First, don’t be fully leveraged.** Never commit all your chips to a single protocol. This is the most fundamental risk management wisdom.

**Second, diversify protocols.** Allocate funds across different lending protocols—some in one, some in another. The probability that multiple protocols experience oracle failures simultaneously is already quite low, let alone three or four.

**Third, diversify over time.** Don’t go all-in at the same moment; stagger your deployments. Even if an anomaly occurs at a certain point, only part of your position is affected.

The essence of oracle security is a matter of probability. There is no absolute safety, but through redundancy design and personal risk management, we can reduce the likelihood of bad events to an acceptable level.
BNB-0,28%
LINK-0,69%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LucidSleepwalkervip
· 18h ago
Wow, that's why I never hold a full position, it's really scary.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTradervip
· 01-13 11:35
It sounds really scary but also very real. That's why I never hold a full position. Diversification truly saves lives. Multiple protocols and spreading over time is my belief.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMastervip
· 01-13 02:51
Haha, oracle misclick, I've seen this before... There was an airdrop project that almost got me a big haul because of such a basic mistake. To be honest, multi-signature security is indeed reliable, but let me be straightforward—most project teams' operational skills are worrying. Do you expect their nodes to never make mistakes? Hehe. But brother, your point about diversification is correct. That's why I have three kids and am still alive, never fully invested in a single protocol. This is the white hat survival rule.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborervip
· 01-13 02:45
It's human language, but if such a thing really happened on the chain, it would have been a total loss long ago.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamervip
· 01-13 02:41
This accidental mistake risk is really too close to us. Going from $0 to $600 means liquidation. It's terrifying.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeatervip
· 01-13 02:35
Good morning... 3:30 AM. As for oracles, to put it simply, it's about betting that multiple nodes won't fail at the same time, but human nature... I'm not that optimistic.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)