2026-01-13 02:29:24

A new token $STIMMY has just launched, and the underlying logic is quite interesting — it completely eliminates the platform's commission mechanism. Simply put, in the past, creators earned money on various platforms and had to be exploited by middlemen, with fees layered and split. Now, $STIMMY has directly changed the rules so that 100% of all fees go straight into the creator’s pocket, and the platform truly takes no cut.

This model is indeed a significant change for creative workers. No hidden costs, more transparent earnings, and creators get to keep everything. In the current exploration of creator economy in Web3, this zero-middleman approach is worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ConsensusBot

· 7h ago

Zero commission sounds great, but the problem is how does the platform stay afloat? Someone has to foot the bill, right?

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTherapist

· 7h ago

Zero middlemen sounds good, but how does the platform survive without taking a cut? This logic doesn't quite add up. $STIMMY really treats creators seriously this time, finally having someone brave enough to do this. Another promise of zero commission, let's see how long they can stick to it. Creators have been losing out to middlemen for so many years; this time, it's truly time for a turnaround. Nice words, but the key is how they proceed from here. Don't just make empty promises again. If it's already like this, why still need a platform? Direct peer-to-peer would be more satisfying. I just want to know where this money is coming from. There's no free lunch in the world. Web3 always talks about revolution, but reality keeps slapping us in the face. Will this time be different? Finally, someone dares to touch the platform's cake. That takes a lot of courage.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 7h ago

Wait, can the platform really sustain zero fees? Based on historical data, these types of projects usually start adjusting their fee structures after TVL reaches a critical point. It's worth checking if there are any hidden governance parameters in their smart contract code.

View OriginalReply0

RektButAlive

· 7h ago

Wait, the platform really doesn't take a commission? Then how do they survive? Is it by faith?

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 7h ago

Uh, wait, is this platform really not making money? How does it sustain itself? --- Zero middlemen sounds great, but I still want to know how the project team profits. --- Finally someone remembers creators; they've all been exploited to baldness. --- $STIMMY is a good name; if it rugs next time, remember to notify me. --- Sounds wonderful, but whether it can actually be implemented is the key. --- There are countless explorations into creator economy; can this one survive more than three months? --- No commission? Then what supports the value of the token? --- This idea has been mentioned before, but few can see it through to the end. --- I only believe it if it's truly all for creators; I'll observe for a while before jumping in. --- Another project claiming to be decentralized; the套路 is still the same.

View OriginalReply0

CantAffordPancake

· 7h ago

Too many of these zero-middleman claims have been heard before. How many of them can really be implemented? Let's see how long the creator economy can sustain. Cutting commissions and claiming 100% flows—how is it supposed to make money? Whether it's reliable or not, you'll have to judge with your own feet. Feels like the same old tricks, just rebranded and told again. If this wave can truly reach the creators' hands, that would be great. Don't let it be another new way to cut profits. How can $STIMMY ensure it won't run away? Seems a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0