That was definitely a solid question raised in the conversation. But the counterargument? Pretty disappointing, honestly. Weak reasoning and it didn't really address the core issue at all. Felt like a missed opportunity for a meaningful exchange in the community.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NewPumpamentals
· 01-13 03:08
Refuting is indeed weak, is that all? It seems like no one really wants to clarify the issue.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e87b21ee
· 01-13 02:59
The rebuttal is indeed a bit weak, feels like slacking off.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 01-13 02:57
Are you arguing so strongly? I really can't see where it's justified.
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 01-13 02:54
Such a weak rebuttal, it's better not to say anything.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.eth
· 01-13 02:45
Bro, your rebuttal really sucks. You just spout a bunch of nonsense and don't hit the point at all.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 01-13 02:32
Refuting this part is indeed disappointing; it didn't hit the mark.
That was definitely a solid question raised in the conversation. But the counterargument? Pretty disappointing, honestly. Weak reasoning and it didn't really address the core issue at all. Felt like a missed opportunity for a meaningful exchange in the community.