2026-01-13 02:30:09

Worth thinking through this one carefully.

You can hold both ideas at once: Kontigo might genuinely be a poorly managed operation with serious legal issues. At the same time, it's hard to criticize ordinary people in Venezuela who are simply trying to navigate around sanctions—finding practical solutions isn't the same as endorsing corporate misconduct. These aren't mutually exclusive positions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerPrivateKey

· 01-13 02:59

Hmm... That makes sense, but reality is so distorted. The survival methods of grassroots people and corporate misconduct can't be generalized, but the real losers are still retail investors, right?

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentSage

· 01-13 02:59

Basically, it's the same old story... criticizing corporate scandals on one hand while sympathizing with ordinary people on the other—this logic is quite circular.

View OriginalReply0

Anon4461

· 01-13 02:57

It sounds like they want to have their cake and eat it too—want to use it while pretending to be innocent.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 01-13 02:57

Hey, speaking of which, this logic is indeed clear-headed... The company may be bad, but the real dilemma is that the common people are being sanctioned.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityLarry

· 01-13 02:44

NGL, this logic indeed holds up... It can criticize the company's flaws without shifting blame onto ordinary people. It's not a black-and-white, two-choice situation. It's rare to see such rational analysis.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerAirdrop

· 01-13 02:33

Hmm... Does this logic seem to assume that sanctions themselves are problematic? To put it simply, it's still just making excuses for illegal activities.

View OriginalReply0