Current AI systems like Claude remind me of early operating systems. Think of it this way: Claude operates more like DOS or an early shell environment—functional but fundamentally limited in scope.
We're still waiting for the "Windows 3.1 moment" in AI. That breakthrough generation that's genuinely transformative, not just an incremental upgrade. The leaps forward are coming, but we're not there yet.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForeverBuyingDips
· 13h ago
Haha, that's a great analogy, but I think Claude is no longer considered DOS now, at least it can do work. The real turning point should be when it can independently iterate; right now, it's still in the manual tuning stage.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 13h ago
Haha, the analogy of the DOS era is interesting, but I think the current Claude is already sufficient. Why wait for the Windows 3.1 moment?
---
Really? Still hoping for a major breakthrough? These models already do quite a bit of work now.
---
Windows 3.1? Oh please, I just want to know when the next hit application will appear. Stop talking about those historical analogies.
---
Wait a minute, why does it seem like every year someone says "a big breakthrough is coming," only to have similar updates the next year?
---
The leap from DOS to Windows was indeed a qualitative change, but does AI really still have such a huge gap? It feels like it's already changing.
---
A leap forward? Wake up, the whole industry is just competing over parameters. I don't see where the revolutionary breakthrough is.
---
Sounds nice, but probably still need to wait several years. Anyway, I don't hold much hope.
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamer
· 13h ago
Sounds like waiting for a savior, but I think the DOS era is already enough.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 13h ago
Now I feel like Claude is just a fancy notepad; the real magic is still to come.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 14h ago
Already hyping Claude as the savior during the DOS era, but when the real Windows 3.1 arrives, these fans will be so embarrassed today.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorker
· 14h ago
Isn't current AI still in the command-line stage? The real graphical interface is just around the corner, and sooner or later it will arrive. It's just a matter of who can be the first to seize this opportunity.
Current AI systems like Claude remind me of early operating systems. Think of it this way: Claude operates more like DOS or an early shell environment—functional but fundamentally limited in scope.
We're still waiting for the "Windows 3.1 moment" in AI. That breakthrough generation that's genuinely transformative, not just an incremental upgrade. The leaps forward are coming, but we're not there yet.