The paradigm shift is already underway. AI-generated art isn't just catching up—it's fundamentally reshaping what "execution" means. Speed and efficiency aren't marginal gains anymore; they're game-changers. What used to take months now takes minutes.



Here's what gets overlooked: the bottleneck was always human bandwidth. Talented creators had brilliant visions but finite hours. Now? Conceptual firepower matters more than technical grunt work. The person who can articulate a vision wins. The lazy genius beats the diligent grinder every single time.

Artistry is migrating from hand-craftsmanship to intellectual framework. Ideas that were impossible to execute yesterday become trivial today. This flips the entire value hierarchy. You're watching the creative economy restructure in real-time.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketHustlervip
· 01-13 03:03
Honestly, this logic is a bit flawed. Having a good idea ≠ being able to implement it. You still need skilled artisans to bring things to life; AI is just a tool. Don't mythologize it.
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlockervip
· 01-13 03:02
ngl that's why I increasingly look down on those creative people who only rely on effort... the ones who truly win are always those who can define the vision
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuthvip
· 01-13 03:00
This logic has some issues... Can lazy genius really win? Or is it just a matter of sounding good?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecuevip
· 01-13 02:49
Speaking of which, ideas are indeed valuable, but what about those artisans? It seems no one has calculated the cost of this round of淘汰.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)