A U.S. Attorney's office has publicly defended its investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, asserting that the central bank repeatedly sidestepped information requests concerning budget overruns and Powell's congressional testimony. According to the office's statement, these uncooperative responses from the Fed left investigators with no choice but to pursue formal legal mechanisms to obtain the necessary documentation. The dispute highlights growing tensions over transparency and information access within the nation's monetary policy apparatus.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CrashHotline
· 6h ago
The Federal Reserve is shifting the blame again. Their transparency is truly remarkable—just the usual bureaucratic routine.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 6h ago
Is the Federal Reserve starting to shift the blame again? Transparency really is a luxury for them.
View OriginalReply0
DevChive
· 6h ago
Is the Federal Reserve playing dead again? This trick is really worn out; no matter how much money is poured in, it can't change this constitution.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 6h ago
Fed is playing hide and seek again, and this time they got caught red-handed.
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteran
· 6h ago
The Federal Reserve is still playing hide and seek, hilarious. The transparency is just ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleShadow
· 6h ago
Fed is playing hide and seek again. I don't understand why transparency is so difficult.
A U.S. Attorney's office has publicly defended its investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, asserting that the central bank repeatedly sidestepped information requests concerning budget overruns and Powell's congressional testimony. According to the office's statement, these uncooperative responses from the Fed left investigators with no choice but to pursue formal legal mechanisms to obtain the necessary documentation. The dispute highlights growing tensions over transparency and information access within the nation's monetary policy apparatus.