2026-01-13 03:02:54

MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor recently expressed his latest view, predicting that 2026 will become the greatest year for Bitcoin, and hinted that the crypto market may enter a super cycle.

The interesting part of this argument is that it breaks the traditional four-year halving cycle pattern. According to historical data, Bitcoin's bull markets usually strictly follow a four-year cycle, but Saylor's prediction seems to challenge this "golden rule."

However, to be fair, he did not provide a specific price target in this interview. Whether he is aiming for 10 million or 20 million USD, he did not elaborate. This has led many community members to joke that "this time the amount of milk is clearly insufficient"—after all, precise numerical targets often excite the market more than vague cycle theories.

For long-term holders, the concept of a super cycle remains a noteworthy signal. But ultimately, the market trend will be determined by actual on-chain data and the global macro environment.

BTC-2,03%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LostBetweenChains

· 15h ago

Saylor really doesn't seem to have much momentum this time, only talking nicely without providing numbers. Isn't that just flooding the market? 2026, right? I bet he'll come up with a new explanation by then. This guy just loves that routine. But the term "super cycle" still sounds great; let's just take it as a mental boost.

View OriginalReply0

HashRatePhilosopher

· 01-14 03:29

Saylor is starting to tell stories again. Who would believe in a bull market theory without numbers? Wait, is the super cycle serious? Feels like I hear similar claims every year. 2026? Let's see how this year's trend goes first, on-chain data is the real thing. This guy only knows how to make promises, where are the precise targets? 10 million, 20 million, just give a number. Insufficient backing, it's all virtual cycle theory again, might as well just say how many USD are really involved. Breaking the four-year cycle rule? I thought I heard that argument last year. Anyway, I just hold, regardless of whether it's a super cycle or not. Why do they always like to say such vague things in interviews? It doesn't excite me. The macro environment is like this now, relying on cycle theories is a bit risky. This time, there's really nothing new, just take it as a story.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-bd883c58

· 01-13 03:32

Saylor is really holding back this time, making such vague predictions, they might as well give a specific number. Is 2026 the greatest? Laughs, but it still depends on whether we can hold on now. Insufficient milk supply is true; what's the use of being vague all day? Just put out a number. Breaking the four-year cycle? Come on, the historical data is right there. Listening to long-term HODL advice is fine, but don't take it as gospel; on-chain data is the real authority. By the way, when has his prediction ever been accurate? It's more reliable to focus on macro factors. This kind of ambiguous rhetoric is just trying to ride the hype and avoid taking responsibility. Every super cycle is just hype, and in the end, it's still the same cycle repetition.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBuffet

· 01-13 03:30

Basically, Saylor's move is just kite flying. Predictions without numbers are useless. Breaking the four-year cycle? Nonsense. First, see if 2026 can outperform macro trends before bragging. This guy's predictions are indeed weak; just shouting about super cycles is pointless. On-chain data is king. His forecasts are just for listening. 2026? Focus on the present first, don't always think about the next cycle.

View OriginalReply0

MetaDreamer

· 01-13 03:19

Another set of "super cycle" rhetoric, Saylor really didn't provide any numbers this time, it sounds all vague and floaty.

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 01-13 03:18

Not enough strength, give us a specific number so we can get excited. What's the use of just talking about the cycle?

View OriginalReply0

rug_connoisseur

· 01-13 03:10

Saylor is telling stories again. Without specific numerical targets, it's like not saying anything. Truly unconvincing. I just want to know how much is being staked. Can we stop talking about cycles? Is 2026 the greatest? Let's wait until 2025 to see, haha. The four-year cycle has long been broken. Anything can happen now. Anyway, I’m still HODLing. Precise numbers vs. vague cycles, the community sees through it at a glance. This routine is too familiar. Super cycles are still super cycles, but on-chain data is the real indicator. Don’t get hyped too high. Predictions without concrete targets are just IQ taxes. If you take it seriously, you lose. Wait, is he again making excuses for MicroStrategy to accumulate coins? This time, his argument sounds a bit hollow. Compared to his previous wild claims, it’s worlds apart. Forget it, 2026 is still far away. It’s still okay to buy now.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamBreaker

· 01-13 03:04

Saylor is telling stories again, claiming 2026 will be the greatest? Just state the specific numbers first; anyone can just talk about dreams. Not even daring to give a target price, this confidence is really lacking. The super cycle sounds great, but on-chain data and macro factors are the real bosses.

View OriginalReply0