2026-01-13 03:10:51

#密码资产动态追踪 Recently, a major vulnerability attack occurred in a certain public blockchain ecosystem. The attacker exploited system loopholes to forge tokens and stole approximately $3.9 million worth of assets through cross-chain bridging. Fortunately, legitimate user assets were not affected.

The community governance committee immediately activated an emergency response plan. On one hand, they urgently recovered the forged tokens from exchanges; on the other hand, they isolated malicious assets on the chain to prevent further spread. Holders of mainstream cryptocurrencies such as $BTC and $BNB also received risk alerts.

The current clear timeline for resolution is: the forged tokens will be permanently destroyed on January 30. The foundation has revoked the temporary additional permissions previously granted to the governance committee, marking the end of the emergency phase. Subsequent vulnerability fixes are also progressing in an orderly manner, with ecosystem security measures being further upgraded. The risk control mechanisms for cross-chain bridging have been strengthened.

BTC1,55%

BNB1,73%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTDreamer

· 45m ago

3.9 million can still be recovered. This time, luck is on our side, much better than those who ran away directly before.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 13h ago

$3.9 million just gone, cross-chain bridging is really a trap --- Fortunately, user assets are safe, or it would have caused a panic --- Burned on January 30? That'll take a long time, and in the meantime, we have to stay alert --- The governance committee responded quickly, but can they prevent this next time? --- Another cross-chain vulnerability, when will this thing finally be truly secure? --- Revoking permissions is nothing, I'm more concerned about when the $3.9 million will be recovered --- Risk control upgrades after upgrades, it feels like every time it's just armchair quarterbacking afterward --- It's a good thing that legitimate users dodged a bullet, otherwise, there would be another wave of withdrawals --- I'm numb to this kind of thing now, still holding strong --- The issue with cross-chain bridging still hasn't been properly solved

View OriginalReply0

NeverPresent

· 13h ago

3.9 million USD just disappeared like that. Cross-chain bridging is becoming increasingly unreliable. --- Fortunately, user assets are safe, or the community would be in an uproar. --- Both vulnerabilities and counterfeit tokens—why are these issues so frequent? --- Burned on January 30th. Not bad timing; at least the attitude is clear. --- Revoking governance committee permissions—this move is quite interesting. --- I trust the upgrade of cross-chain risk control, just worried about more surprises. --- 3.9 million USD—that would require how many small retail investors to lose their money to make up for it? --- The key is that fixing the vulnerabilities must be reliable; otherwise, it's just a temporary fix, not a permanent solution.

View OriginalReply0

BanklessAtHeart

· 13h ago

3.9 million USD just gone like that. Luckily, I didn't have a heavy position on that chain, or I would have gone crazy.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 13h ago

$3.9 million just gone, cross-chain bridging really can't be trusted at all --- Fortunately, it didn't affect user assets, or it would have caused a panic --- Wait, were the temporary permissions revoked? Feels like we're back to square one --- Burned on January 30th, will it really be completely cleared out this time? --- We've said many times that the risk control mechanism has been upgraded, will it work this time? --- It's good that legitimate user assets are safe, much better than some public chains --- Cross-chain bridges are just a hidden risk, when will they truly be safe?

View OriginalReply0