2026-01-13 03:21:50

The latest governance proposal from Inter Link is drawing significant attention in the community. Proposal 14 introduces a token recovery mechanism for $ITLG, allowing previously burned tokens to be reclaimed under specific conditions. This move sparks an interesting debate: should the protocol prioritize token recovery to maintain liquidity and provide flexibility, or maintain the deflationary pressure that comes with permanent burns? Token holders are weighing the trade-offs carefully. Some argue recovery mechanisms strengthen ecosystem resilience, while others believe sustained burns create scarcity and value preservation. The community discussion reflects broader questions about tokenomics design. Where do you stand on this proposal—recovery or continued deflation?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainFoodie

· 01-13 03:48

nah this is basically like asking if your sourdough starter should stay burnt or get revived... token burns are supposed to be *permanent*, that's the whole point of the recipe, you know? but then again if itlg keeps bleeding liquidity every time someone needs to exit, what's even the point of a dead token lying there? feels like they're trying to have their cake and eat it too fr fr

Reply0

airdrop_whisperer