2026-01-13 03:25:03

chasing mNAV noise ended up being a distraction—good riddance to that phase. we've learned our lesson there. now we're back on track with what actually matters. momentum's shifting in the right direction.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SmartContractWorker

· 10h ago

That part about chasing mNAV was really stupid, a waste of time... Now we're finally back on track, this is what we should be doing.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityWorker

· 10h ago

The mNAV system should have been abandoned long ago; it was time-consuming and ineffective. Now we're finally back on track, focusing on what needs to be done, and it truly feels different.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 10h ago

The noise tracking of mNAV is indeed a pitfall, wasting too much energy on the wrong things. It has proven that these micro fluctuations are not worth paying attention to and instead disrupt the overall protocol architecture optimization. Now refocusing on the main line, it seems that cross-chain interoperability is the right path.

View OriginalReply0

SilentObserver

· 10h ago

Forget it, chasing after noise like mNAV is indeed a waste of time. Learned my lesson. Now I am finally focusing on the main thing and feel that the direction is right.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 10h ago

Damn, I should have given up on that approach a long time ago. All the fuss was for nothing. Now I can finally focus on doing something truly meaningful, and I really feel the momentum has changed.

View OriginalReply0