Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently articulated an interesting analogy for the future of Ethereum — he hopes that the Ethereum protocol will eventually resemble a finely crafted "hammer," which, once completed, can function stably over the long term without relying on continuous maintenance by developers.
To achieve this goal, Vitalik systematically identified seven key technical areas that need breakthroughs:
First is the fundamental security layer, which requires quantum resistance to prepare Ethereum for future technological challenges. Next, in scalability, solutions like ZK-EVM and PeerDAS are driving dual improvements in network capacity and decentralization. In terms of user experience, universal account models and optimized Gas mechanisms can significantly reduce difficulty and costs.
Decentralization of the ecosystem is also a critical component, requiring the design of block construction mechanisms that resist centralization trends. In financial infrastructure, developing a multi-asset supported decentralized stablecoin system can reduce over-reliance on traditional financial systems. Attention should also be given to democratizing validators and node operations, as well as improving cross-chain interoperability.
Buterin emphasized a key pace of progress — completing at least one major improvement each year. This is not just a technical roadmap issue; fundamentally, it’s about building a resilient, long-term autonomous decentralized ecosystem. In other words, Ethereum should evolve from an ever-changing project into a stable, trustworthy infrastructure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
degenonymous
· 6h ago
Vitalik's hammer analogy this time is quite brilliant, but it sounds like he's hinting that Ethereum still needs daily fixes and patches.
I'm really a bit worried about quantum resistance... Do we have to consider problems that humanity hasn't even solved yet ten or eight years in advance? That's a bit outrageous.
I'm impatient for gas optimization, really, all the money is being eaten up by gas.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 6h ago
Hammer Theory is back again, with a major upgrade every year? Sounds pretty exciting.
Basically, it means to stabilize and stop messing around, but I’m still a bit skeptical.
Can quantum resistance really be implemented? It’s been talked about for many years.
ZK-EVM is indeed impressive, but if PeerDAS can really become popular, that would be even better.
Gas optimization is always the most practical demand; users care about this the most.
Decentralized stablecoins sound good, but can they avoid relying on CeFi? I have some doubts.
I support the democratization of validators; MEV consensus is heading in that direction.
A major upgrade every year? That’s a lot of pressure, developers!
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 6h ago
Vitalik's analogy is really spot on, but then again, pushing forward in seven directions at the same time? Feels a bit greedy.
I'm genuinely worried about quantum resistance. What if it really comes?
As long as the gas fees can be reduced, I don't really care much about the rest, to be honest.
One major improvement each year? Hold on... Is this speed really steady, or is it easy to say but hard to do?
I support decentralized stablecoins. Anyway, right now, USDC can be frozen just by saying so, which is pretty frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiWarrior
· 6h ago
The hammer metaphor sounds satisfying, but seven directions taking a year each? Vitalik really dares to think about it. This progress bar might have to be pushed until 2035...
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSociety
· 6h ago
Hammer? I mistook it for a shovel. A new shovel every year, digging and digging for gas fees...
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently articulated an interesting analogy for the future of Ethereum — he hopes that the Ethereum protocol will eventually resemble a finely crafted "hammer," which, once completed, can function stably over the long term without relying on continuous maintenance by developers.
To achieve this goal, Vitalik systematically identified seven key technical areas that need breakthroughs:
First is the fundamental security layer, which requires quantum resistance to prepare Ethereum for future technological challenges. Next, in scalability, solutions like ZK-EVM and PeerDAS are driving dual improvements in network capacity and decentralization. In terms of user experience, universal account models and optimized Gas mechanisms can significantly reduce difficulty and costs.
Decentralization of the ecosystem is also a critical component, requiring the design of block construction mechanisms that resist centralization trends. In financial infrastructure, developing a multi-asset supported decentralized stablecoin system can reduce over-reliance on traditional financial systems. Attention should also be given to democratizing validators and node operations, as well as improving cross-chain interoperability.
Buterin emphasized a key pace of progress — completing at least one major improvement each year. This is not just a technical roadmap issue; fundamentally, it’s about building a resilient, long-term autonomous decentralized ecosystem. In other words, Ethereum should evolve from an ever-changing project into a stable, trustworthy infrastructure.